Study Design: A retrospective study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to clarify preoperative radiographic predictors associated with the development of subaxial subluxation (SAS) after surgery.

Background: The incidence of atlantoaxial fusion for atlantoaxial instability has been increasing. SAS can develop after surgery despite atlantoaxial fusion with the optimal C1-C2 angle. We hypothesized that preoperative discordant angular contribution in the upper and subaxial cervical spine is associated with the occurrence of postoperative SAS.

Materials And Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for atlantoaxial instability with a minimum 5-year follow-up and control participants were included. The O-C2 angle, C2 slope (C2S), C2-C7 cervical lordosis (CL), and T1 slope (T1S) were measured. We focused on the angular contribution ratio in the upper cervical spine to the whole CL, and the preoperative C2/T1S ratio was defined as the ratio of C2S to T1S.

Results: Twenty-seven patients (SAS=11, no-SAS=16; mean age, 60.7 y old; 77.8% female; mean follow-up duration, 6.8 y) and 23 demographically matched control participants were enrolled. The SAS onset was at 4.7 postoperative years. Preoperatively, the O-C2 angle, C2-C7 CL, and T1S were comparable between the SAS, no-SAS, and control groups. The preoperative C2S and C2/T1S ratio were smaller in the SAS group than in the no-SAS or control group (C2S, 11.0 vs. 18.4 vs. 18.7 degrees; C2/T1S ratio, 0.49 vs. 0.77 vs. 0.78, P <0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the C2/T1S ratio had higher specificity and similar sensitivity as a predictor of postoperative SAS than C2S (specificity: 0.90 vs. 0.87; sensitivity: 0.73 vs. 0.73). The estimated cutoff values of the C2S and C2/T1S ratio were 14 degrees and 0.58, respectively.

Conclusions: The preoperative C2/T1S ratio was closely associated with postoperative SAS. Patients with a C2/T1S ratio <0.58 were at a high risk of SAS after atlantoaxial fusion.

Level Of Evidence: Level 4.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001514DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

atlantoaxial fusion
12
c2/t1s ratio
12
radiographic predictors
8
subaxial subluxation
8
atlantoaxial instability
8
angular contribution
8
cervical spine
8
control participants
8
o-c2 angle
8
no-sas control
8

Similar Publications

Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following posterior atlantoaxial fusion under physiological loading: An in vivo study.

Clin Biomech (Bristol)

January 2025

The Orthopedic Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address:

Background: This study aimed to analyze the three-dimensional cervical motion characteristics in patients who underwent posterior atlantoaxial fusion surgeries using cone beam computed tomography and 3D3D registration technology.

Methods: The study selected 20 patients who underwent posterior atlantoaxial fusion surgery and 20 healthy people as the control group. All subjects underwent cone beam computed tomography scans of the occipital and cervical spine in 7 different functional positions, then 3D3D registration of Occipital-C7 was performed at each functional position to calculate the motion characteristics of each segment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Fractures of the atlas are typically considered stable or unstable based on the integrity of the transverse ligament. Whereas stable Jefferson burst fractures can be treated nonoperatively, unstable fractures with disruption of the transverse ligament often require surgical intervention. Atlas osteosynthesis has been proposed as a motion-preserving alternative to atlantoaxial fusion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Cervical myelopathy, a condition affecting the spinal cord in the neck, is commonly treated with either atlantoaxial fusion (AAF) or occipitocervical fusion (OCF), though there hasn't been a comprehensive study comparing their outcomes.
  • The goal of this research was to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological results of AAF versus OCF over a minimum follow-up period of 2 years, involving 64 patients.
  • Results indicated that while both surgical techniques had similar overall outcomes in terms of neck pain and disability scores, patients who underwent OCF experienced significantly greater declines in lifting function and neck range of motion compared to the AAF group after the surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Vertebral arterial injury (VAI) can be a serious complication after C1-C2 posterior screw fixation, as observed in a case of a 34-year-old woman with quadriplegia who suffered bilateral VAI caused by her surgical screws.
  • Postoperative imaging revealed that the screws had violated the vertebral arteries but did not result in any neurological deterioration or infarction.
  • The case highlights the importance of careful screw placement to prevent VAI during surgery, as well as the potential for variations in blood circulation to impact patient outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Posterior Reduction and Temporary Fixation Through Intermuscular Approach for Odontoid Fracture.

Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)

October 2024

Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai , People's Republic of China.

Background And Objective: Posterior reduction and temporary fixation (PRTF) through open approach can effectively avoid the loss of C1-C2 motion caused by posterior atlantoaxial fusion in the treatment of odontoid fracture. PRTF through intermuscular approach can preserve the integrity of the paravertebral muscle. However, its contribution to the preservation of C1-C2 rotation remains unassessed in the context of fresh odontoid fractures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!