A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Endovascular therapy for acute intracranial large vessel occlusion due to atherothrombosis: Multicenter historical registry. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Atherothrombotic stroke-related large vessel occlusion (AT-LVO) occurs from either intracranial artery occlusion or embolism from cervical carotid issues, with unclear outcomes after endovascular therapy (EVT).
  • A study involving 582 patients revealed that those with intracranial occlusions were generally younger, had a lower smoking rate, and experienced a higher incidence of recurrent ischemic strokes after EVT compared to the tandem group.
  • Although the intracranial group had worse overall outcomes (22.5% recurrence vs. 8.2%), there were no significant differences in rates of intracerebral hemorrhage or death between the two groups.

Article Abstract

Background: Atherothrombotic stroke-related large vessel occlusion (AT-LVO) is caused by two etiologies, the intracranial artery occlusion due to in situ occlusion (intracranial group) or due to embolism from cervical carotid occlusion or stenosis (tandem group). The prognosis and reocclusion rate of each etiology after endovascular therapy (EVT) is unclear.

Methods: We conducted a historical multicenter registry study at 51 Japanese centers to compare the prognoses of AT-LVO between two etiologies. The primary outcome was the incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke or reocclusion of the treated vessels within 90 days after EVT. Each of the primary outcome means the incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke and reocclusion of the treated vessels within 90 days after EVT.

Results: We analyzed 582 patients (338 in the intracranial group and 244 in the tandem group). Patients in the intracranial group were younger (mean 71.9 vs 74.5, p=0.003), more of them were female and fewer of them were current smokers than those in the tandem group. In the tandem group, the patients' National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission was higher (13 vs 15, p=0.006), onset to puncture time was shorter (299 [145-631] vs 232 [144-459] minutes, p=0.03) and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was lower (8 [7-9] vs 8 [6-9], p=0.0002). The primary outcome was higher in the intracranial group (22.5% vs 8.2%, p<0.0001). However, any ICH and death were not significantly different in the two groups.

Conclusions: The incidence of recurrent ischemic stroke or reocclusion after EVT for AT-LVO was higher in the intracranial group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-020670DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intracranial group
16
tandem group
16
primary outcome
12
endovascular therapy
8
large vessel
8
vessel occlusion
8
group
8
outcome incidence
8
incidence recurrent
8
recurrent ischemic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!