Chater & Loewenstein argue that i-frame research has been coopted by private interests opposed to system-level reform, leading to ineffective interventions. They recommend that behavioural scientists refocus on system-level interventions. We suggest that the influence of private interests on research is problematic for wider normative and epistemic reasons. A system-level intervention to shield research from private influence is needed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X2300095X | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
private interests
12
influence private
8
interests behavioural
4
behavioural public
4
public policy
4
system-level
4
policy system-level
4
system-level problem
4
problem chater
4
chater loewenstein
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!