New-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques have brought the opportunity for genomic monitoring of several microorganisms potentially relevant to public health. The establishment of different methods with different mechanisms provides a wide choice, taking into account several aspects. With that in mind, the present aim of the study was to compare basic genomic sequencing metrics that could potentially impact genotyping by nanopores from Oxford Nanopore Technologies and by synthesis from Illumina in clinical samples positive for Chikungunya (CHIKV). Among the metrics studied, running time, read production, and Q score were better represented in Illumina sequencing, while the MinIOn platform showed better response time and greater diversity of generated files. That said, it was possible to establish differences between the studied metrics in addition to verifying that the distinctions in the methods did not impact the identification of the CHIKV virus genotype.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465416PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43141-023-00536-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical samples
8
technical comparison
4
comparison minion
4
minion illumina
4
illumina technologies
4
technologies genotyping
4
genotyping chikungunya
4
chikungunya virus
4
virus clinical
4
samples new-generation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!