AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to validate and update the Feverkids tool, a clinical prediction model designed to help differentiate between bacterial pneumonia, serious bacterial infections (SBIs), and non-SBI causes of fever in immunocompromised children.
  • Conducted in 15 hospitals across nine European countries, the study involved observational data from febrile immunocompromised children aged 0-18 years.
  • Results showed improved accuracy in predicting bacterial pneumonia and SBIs after model updates, indicating effective thresholds that can help minimize unnecessary medical interventions and antibiotic use.

Article Abstract

Objective: To externally validate and update the Feverkids tool clinical prediction model for differentiating bacterial pneumonia and other serious bacterial infections (SBIs) from non-SBI causes of fever in immunocompromised children.

Design: International, multicentre, prospective observational study embedded in PErsonalised Risk assessment in Febrile illness to Optimise Real-life Management across the European Union (PERFORM).

Setting: Fifteen teaching hospitals in nine European countries.

Participants: Febrile immunocompromised children aged 0-18 years.

Methods: The Feverkids clinical prediction model predicted the probability of bacterial pneumonia, other SBI or no SBI. Model discrimination, calibration and diagnostic performance at different risk thresholds were assessed. The model was then re-fitted and updated.

Results: Of 558 episodes, 21 had bacterial pneumonia, 104 other SBI and 433 no SBI. Discrimination was 0.83 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.90) for bacterial pneumonia, with moderate calibration and 0.67 (0.61 to 0.72) for other SBIs, with poor calibration. After model re-fitting, discrimination improved to 0.88 (0.79 to 0.96) and 0.71 (0.65 to 0.76) and calibration improved. Predicted risk <1% ruled out bacterial pneumonia with sensitivity 0.95 (0.86 to 1.00) and negative likelihood ratio (LR) 0.09 (0.00 to 0.32). Predicted risk >10% ruled in bacterial pneumonia with specificity 0.91 (0.88 to 0.94) and positive LR 6.51 (3.71 to 10.3). Predicted risk <10% ruled out other SBIs with sensitivity 0.92 (0.87 to 0.97) and negative LR 0.32 (0.13 to 0.57). Predicted risk >30% ruled in other SBIs with specificity 0.89 (0.86 to 0.92) and positive LR 2.86 (1.91 to 4.25).

Conclusion: Discrimination and calibration were good for bacterial pneumonia but poorer for other SBIs. The rule-out thresholds have the potential to reduce unnecessary investigations and antibiotics in this high-risk group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-325869DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bacterial pneumonia
24
prediction model
12
pneumonia serious
8
bacterial
8
serious bacterial
8
bacterial infections
8
febrile immunocompromised
8
immunocompromised children
8
clinical prediction
8
discrimination calibration
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!