Objective: Intensive glycemic therapy reduced coronary artery disease (CAD) events among White participants in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study with the haptoglobin (Hp)2-2 phenotype, while participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype had no CAD benefit. The association between achieved glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and CAD for each Hp phenotype remains unknown.

Research Design And Methods: Achieved HbA1c was similar in each phenotype throughout the study. Prospectively collected HbA1c data (categorized as <6.0%, 6.0-6.5%, 6.6-6.9%, or ≥8.0% compared with 7.0-7.9%) from the ACCORD study, updated every 4 months over a median of 4.7 years, were analyzed in relation to CAD in the Hp2-2 (n = 3,322) and non-Hp2-2 (n = 5,949) phenotypes separately overall, and within White (63%, 37% Hp2-2) and Black (19%, 26% Hp2-2) participants using Cox proportional hazards regression with time-varying covariables.

Results: Compared with HbA1c of 7.0-7.9%, having HbA1c ≥8.0% was associated with CAD risk among White (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.43, 95% CI 1.03-1.98) and Black (2.86, 1.09-7.51) participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype, but not when all Hp2-2 participants were combined overall (1.30, 0.99-1.70), and not among participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype. HbA1c <7.0% was not associated with a lower risk of CAD for any Hp phenotype.

Conclusions: Achieving HbA1c >8.0% compared with 7.0-7.9% was consistently associated with incident CAD risk among White and Black ACCORD participants with the Hp2-2 phenotype, while no association was observed among participants without the Hp2-2 phenotype. We found no evidence that HbA1c concentration <7.0% prevents CAD in either Hp phenotype group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc23-0760DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

achieved hba1c
8
hp2-2 phenotype
8
phenotype
5
relationship time-varying
4
time-varying achieved
4
hba1c
4
hba1c risk
4
risk coronary
4
coronary events
4
events depends
4

Similar Publications

Objective: No meta-analysis has holistically analyzed and summarized the efficacy and safety of the novel once-weekly basal insulin efsitora alfa in managing type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: Clinical trials involving subjects with T1D and T2D receiving once-weekly efsitora alfa in the intervention arm and once-daily basal insulins in the control arm were searched throughout the electronic databases. The primary outcome assessed was the change from baseline in HbA1c.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Smoking affects glycemic control in individuals with type1 diabetes (T1D); however, its impact in the era of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has not been thoroughly studied.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at two centers, involving 405 T1D patients treated with multiple daily insulin injections and using CGM. The patients were matched using propensity scores based on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This analysis aimed to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of tirzepatide 5 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg (both administered once weekly) in people not achieving glycemic control on metformin, based on the results of the head-to-head SURPASS J-mono trial from a Japanese healthcare payer perspective.

Methods: A cost-utility analysis was performed over a 50-year time horizon using an implementation of the UKPDS Outcomes Model 2 developed in Microsoft Excel.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hemoglobin A1c and abdominal obesity as predictors of diabetes and ASCVD in individuals with prediabetes in UK Biobank: a prospective observational study.

Cardiovasc Diabetol

December 2024

Department of Medicine, Mike and Valeria Rosenbloom Centre for Cardiovascular Prevention, McGill University Health Centre-Royal Victoria Hospital, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, Québec, H4A 3J1, Canada.

Objectives: Whether "prediabetes" merits particular clinical attention beyond the management of associated risk factors is controversial, particularly given the expansion of the definition of prediabetes from HbA1c 6.0-6.4% to 5.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

of what is New or Different 1. This chapter recommends a target HbA1c of ≤6.5% (48mmol/mol) for those who have access to advanced diabetes technologies like continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and automated insulin delivery (AID).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!