A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Evaluation of Detectability in Clinical Practice of Metal Detectors, etc. for Magnetic Resonance Imaging]. | LitMetric

Purpose: In order to prevent magnetic materials from being brought into the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination room, many facilities have metal detectors, etc., but there are various types of equipment with different performance and characteristics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate each detector in actual clinical practice.

Methods: At multiple facilities, gate-type magnetic detectors, pole-type magnetic detectors, handy-type magnetic detectors, and handy-type metal detectors were used to identify 9 types of objects that may be brought into the MRI examination room. We performed evaluation of detection distance measurement assuming actual operation.

Results: The gate type was only able to detect objects with strong magnetism. With the pole type, the closer the measurement distance was to the pole, the more objects could be detected, and the lower the pole, the shorter the detection distance. With the handy type, there were many objects that could be detected when the device and the object were brought into close contact.

Conclusion: The detectability of the instruments varied depending on the size and type of the object. It is important to understand the characteristics of each device and use it according to the purpose in carrying-in confirmation before the examination.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2023-1372DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

metal detectors
12
magnetic detectors
12
magnetic resonance
8
mri examination
8
examination room
8
detectors handy-type
8
detection distance
8
objects detected
8
detectors
6
magnetic
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!