A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Predicting vertical ground reaction force in rearfoot running: A wavelet neural network model and factor loading. | LitMetric

This study proposed a simple method for selecting input variables by factor loading and inputting these variables into a wavelet neural network (WNN) model to predict vertical ground reaction force (vGRF). The kinematic data and vGRF of 9 rearfoot strikers at 12, 14, and 16 km/h were collected using a motion capture system and an instrumented treadmill. The input variables were screened by factor loading and utilized to predict vGRF with the WNN. Nine kinematic variables were selected, corresponding to nine principal components, mainly focusing on the knee and ankle joints. The prediction results of vGRF were effective and accurate at different speeds, namely, the coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) > 0.98 (0.984-0.988), the normalized root means square error (NRMSE) < 15% (9.34-11.51%). The NRMSEs of impact force (8.18-10.01%), active force (4.92-7.42%), and peak time (7.16-12.52%) were less than 15%. There was a small number (peak, 4.12-6.18%; time, 4.71-6.76%) exceeding the 95% confidence interval (CI) using the Bland-Altman method. The knee joint was the optimal location for estimating vGRF, followed by the ankle. There were high accuracy and agreement for predicting vGRF with the peak and peak time at 12, 14, and 16 km/h. Therefore, factor loading could be a valid method to screen kinematic variables in artificial neural networks.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2023.2251767DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

factor loading
16
vertical ground
8
ground reaction
8
reaction force
8
wavelet neural
8
neural network
8
input variables
8
kinematic variables
8
peak time
8
vgrf
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!