AI Article Synopsis

  • Transsphenoidal resection is the main treatment for most pituitary adenomas, but there's ongoing debate about whether microsurgical or endoscopic methods are better for accessing these tumors.
  • The shift towards endoscopic techniques has led to increased interest in comparing the effectiveness and safety of both approaches, though conflicting findings make it hard to determine which is superior.
  • This review examines existing literature, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each surgical method, and emphasizes the importance of patient-specific factors and surgical expertise on treatment outcomes.

Article Abstract

Transsphenoidal resection remains the standard treatment for most pituitary adenomas. However, the ideal surgical approach to safely access these lesions, either microsurgical or endoscopic, continues to be debated. Since the introduction of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery, centers around the world have increasingly adopted this technique, experiencing a shift away from the conventional microsurgical approach. Large series reporting the efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery have fueled a growing interest in comparing clinical outcomes between both approaches. Still, proving superiority of either surgical approach remains an elusive task due to the inherent drawbacks of surgical observational studies, as we are still faced with a growing body of evidence reporting conflicting results. Thus, a comprehensive discussion regarding the reach and limitations of both techniques becomes necessary. In this narrative review, we perform a critical appraisal of the literature and provide an expert opinion on the state-of-the-art in transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas. The advantages and limitations of each approach are assessed and compared from a technical standpoint, and their reported outcomes evaluated in the framework of this transition phase. Available evidence should be interpreted in light of individual patient characteristics and within the context of each medical center, taking into consideration the known impact that surgical expertise and multidisciplinary management hold on clinical outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2023.102872DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transsphenoidal surgery
12
pituitary adenomas
12
endoscopic transsphenoidal
8
surgery pituitary
8
narrative review
8
surgical approach
8
clinical outcomes
8
current future
4
future perspectives
4
perspectives microscopic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!