AI Article Synopsis
- * Conducted in Victoria, Australia, the survey analyzed changes in parents' decisional conflict, hesitancy, and intention to vaccinate before and after using the tool.
- * Results showed that while the tool reduced decisional conflict in 25% of participants, the majority remained hesitant or unchanged in their intention to vaccinate, with the greatest improvement seen among those who were initially undecided.
Article Abstract
COVID-19 vaccine uptake among 5-11-year-olds is significantly lower than that of the 12+ age group. Some parents may have decided against vaccinating their children for COVID-19; others may be undecided and may be seeking more information to support their decision. We aimed to assess the effect of a decision support tool on parents' level of decisional conflict, vaccine hesitancy, and intention to vaccinate. We conducted a single-arm, cross-sectional online pre-post intervention survey of parents from Victoria, Australia, who had not yet vaccinated their 5-11-year-old child for COVID-19. We measured change in decisional conflict, intention, and hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccines for children before and after viewing a decision support tool. We used logistic regression to identify characteristics associated with reduced decisional conflict. Between May and September 2022, 108 parents took part in the study. The tool reduced decision conflict in 25% (27/107) of parents, with reduced decisional conflict more likely among parents initially undecided about vaccinating, compared to parents who did not intend to vaccinate their child (OR, 12.58 95% CI 3.21 to 9.30). For most parents, hesitancy (83%, 90/108) and intention (89%, 96/108) remained the same. The decision support tool was modestly effective at reducing decisional conflict, particularly among undecided parents.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10458235 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11081296 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Chain Mediating Effect of Social Support and Trust in Physician on Stroke Caregivers' Decision Self-Efficacy and Decision Conflict.
Nurs Health Sci
March 2025
School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
To explore the chain mediating role of social support and trust in between decision self-efficacy and decision conflict of stroke caregivers. Convenient sampling was used to select stroke caregivers who were admitted to the department of neurology, neurosurgery and rehabilitation in a four-3A hospital in Henan Province from September 2023 to April 2024. General information questionnaire, Decisional Self-efficacy Scale, Social Support Scale, Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale and Decisional Conflict Scale were adopted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExploring the decisional needs of patients living with subacromial pain syndrome: A qualitative needs assessment study.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract
January 2025
Center for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. Electronic address:
Background: There are a variety of different treatments for patients living with subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS). All treatments have small to moderate effect sizes, and it is challenging when healthcare practitioners and patients need to decide on which treatment options to choose. The aim of this study was to explore and understand the decisional needs of patients with SAPS, to inform and support the decision-making process.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAssociations of Concordant and Shared Lung Cancer Screening Decision Making with Decisional Conflict: A Multi-Institution Cross-Sectional Analysis.
MDM Policy Pract
January 2025
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Unlabelled: Many organizations recommend structured communication processes, including formal shared decision making (SDM), for patients undergoing lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). We sought to understand if concordant and shared LCS decision making was associated with decisional conflict. In this prospective, observational study, we enrolled patients from 3 medical centers (2 Veterans Health Administration, 1 academic facility) after a decision-making interaction about undergoing LCS but before receiving the LDCT.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProtocol of a decisional intervention for older adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and their caregivers: UR-GOAL 3.
J Geriatr Oncol
January 2025
Section of Hematology/Oncology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, NC, USA. Electronic address:
Introduction: Therapeutic advances have allowed more adults aged ≥60 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to receive life-prolonging treatments, with improvement in overall survival. In contrast to other cancers, the onset of AML is often sudden, high-risk treatment decisions must be made quickly, and survival is often compromised due to aging-related conditions (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLived Experiences of Patients Hospitalized With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Kidney Dysfunction.
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Importance: For patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), the presence of kidney dysfunction can substantially shape prognosis and treatment options. Yet little is known about the lived experiences of these medically vulnerable patients.
Objective: To elicit accounts of the illness and care experiences of patients currently or recently hospitalized with ADHF and kidney dysfunction in order to identify potential opportunities to improve care.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!