A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and ileal conduit with Hugo RAS system: feasibility, setting and perioperative outcomes. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Robotic surgery for bladder removal (called radical cystectomy) is safe and effective, especially using the HugoTM RAS system.
  • Two patients had this surgery, and although one had a minor complication afterward, both surgeries went well with no major problems.
  • The results can help more doctors learn how to use robotic technology for treating bladder cancer, making it easier for patients in the future.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Robotic approach has shown its feasibility and safety with respect to open approach for radical cystectomy (1). The performances of HugoTM RAS system (Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) have been demonstrated in several clinical scenarios (2-5). We report the feasibility and surgical settings of the first series of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal ileal-conduit performed with HugoTM RAS system.

Methods: Two patients were submitted to RARC with ileal conduit at our institution. The trocar placement scheme and the operating room setting with docking angles of the four arms were already described (6). A 12-mm and a 5-mm trocar for the assistant were placed. In both cases, an ileal-conduit with a Wallace type-1 uretero-enteric derivation was performed intra-corporeally.

Results: The first patient was a 71-year-old male with a very-high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer(BC), and the second patient was a 64-year-old male with a diagnosis of T2 high-grade BC. Operative times were 360 and 420 minutes with a docking time of 12 and 9 minutes, respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred. The estimated blood loss was 200ml and 400ml, respectively. The second patient developed an ileus on postoperative day 4 (Clavien-Dindo grade 2). No positive surgical margins were recorded. No recurrence nor progression occurred during follow-up.

Conclusion: RARC with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion is feasible with HugoTM RAS system. We provided insight into the surgical setting using this novel robotic platform to help new adopters to face this challenging procedure. These findings may help a wider distribution of robotic programs for BC treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10947620PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0349DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radical cystectomy
12
ileal conduit
12
ras system
12
hugotm ras
12
robot-assisted radical
8
rarc intracorporeal
8
second patient
8
cystectomy ileal
4
conduit hugo
4
ras
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!