A total of 100 Kangal sheep were divided into four groups with the aim of investigating the effectiveness of resynchronization during anestrus for the first time in the literature. The groups were then divided into two further subgroups, namely the resynchronization subgroup group (hCG+resynch) and group (resynch)) and the no resynchronization subgroup (Group (hCG) and group (control)). All the groups started with progesterone-containing sponge insertion on Day 7. The sponge was removed after 7 days (on Day 0), and 600 IU eCG + 131.5 µg PGF2α was injected. The animals in group (hCG+resynch) and group (hCG) received hCG injection at the time of sponge administration. Accordingly, four different groups were established, i.e., resynchronization + hCG administration group (hCG+resynch); n:25), no resynchronization + hCG administration (group (hCG); n:25), resynchronization + no hCG administration (group (resynch); n:25), and no resynchronization + no hCG administration (Group (control); n:25). Estrus rates at the first application in group (hCG+resynch), group (hCG), group (resynch), and group (control) groups were 76%, 88%, 96%, and 76%, respectively, and pregnancy rates were 52%, 64%, 72%, and 60%, respectively; there were no intergroup statistical differences in the two parameters above. It was concluded that resynchronization performed with two consecutive stimulations during anestrus could help save time and provide a pregnancy rate at a level that can provide economic returns.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10459146 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10080499 | DOI Listing |
Vet Sci
August 2023
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selcuk University, Konya 42130, Türkiye.
A total of 100 Kangal sheep were divided into four groups with the aim of investigating the effectiveness of resynchronization during anestrus for the first time in the literature. The groups were then divided into two further subgroups, namely the resynchronization subgroup group (hCG+resynch) and group (resynch)) and the no resynchronization subgroup (Group (hCG) and group (control)). All the groups started with progesterone-containing sponge insertion on Day 7.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Dairy Sci
October 2012
Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Our objectives were to (1) compare the effect on pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI) of presynchronization of the estrous cycle with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 7d before resynchronization of ovulation (Resynch) initiated 25 d after timed artificial insemination (TAI) and compare the presynchronization treatment with the Double-Ovsynch (DO) protocol, and (2) evaluate whether hCG for presynchronization could be replaced with GnRH. In experiment 1, lactating Holstein cows were blocked by parity and were randomly assigned to receive (1) Resynch-25 (D25), the Resynch protocol (GnRH-7 d-PGF(2 α)-56 h-GnRH-16 h-TAI) initiated 25 d after TAI (n=418); (2) HGPG, presynchronization with hCG (2,000 IU of Chorulon) 7d before D25 (n=450); and (3) DO (Pre-Resynch, GnRH-7 d-PGF(2 α)-72 h-GnRH; Breeding-Resynch, GnRH-7 d-PGF(2 α)-56 h-GnRH-16 h-TAI) initiated 22d after TAI (n=405). At 29 d after TAI, cows in the HGPG (37.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!