Purpose: Neoadjuvant combination immune checkpoint blockade and intralesional oncolytic virotherapy have the potential to activate antitumor responses in patients with breast cancer.

Experimental Design: Eligibility for this pilot phase I trial included patients with localized HER2-negative breast cancer who received systemic nivolumab and ipilimumab and intratumor talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC; NCT04185311). The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and adverse event profile of immunotherapy combined with T-VEC in patients with localized, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Results: Six patients were enrolled, 4 having relapses after prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 2 who were previously untreated. Toxicities included 1 patient having grade 3 hypotension and type 1 diabetes mellitus, 3 patients with hypothyroidism, and all patients having constitutional symptoms known to be associated with the administration of T-VEC. One patient had a pathologic complete response, 3 patients had pathologic partial responses, 1 showed no significant response, and 1 had disease progression. Biopsies demonstrated increased immune cell infiltration in samples from patients who responded to therapy.

Conclusions: This triple immunotherapy regimen provided responses in patients with advanced or relapsed HER2-negative breast cancer, at the expense of long-term toxicities.

Significance: Systemic immune checkpoint blockade with a programmed death receptor 1 and a CTL antigen-4 blocking antibody, combined with intralesional oncolytic virotherapy, is a chemotherapy-free combination aimed at inducing an antitumor immune response locally and systemic immunity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10445661PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0145DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

her2-negative breast
16
intralesional oncolytic
12
oncolytic virotherapy
12
breast cancer
12
patients
9
nivolumab ipilimumab
8
immune checkpoint
8
checkpoint blockade
8
responses patients
8
patients localized
8

Similar Publications

HR/HER2-low breast cancer is a significant subgroup of conventional HR/HER2-negative breast cancer, and combination of CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy is the standard first-line and second-line treatments for advanced HR/HER2-low breast cancer. Nevertheless, it remains uncertain whether HER2 signaling affects the effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitor administered in combination with endocrine therapy for HR/HER2-low breast cancer and suitable intervention measures. This study revealed poor efficacy for CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy for HR/HER2-low breast cancer in vitro and in vivo models.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hormone therapy enhances anti-PD1 efficacy in premenopausal estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Cell Rep Med

December 2024

Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei City 106, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City 100, Taiwan; Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City 100, Taiwan. Electronic address:

The efficacy of immunotherapy for estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative (ER+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has not been proven. We conduct a phase 1b/2 trial to assess the efficacy of combining pembrolizumab (anti-PD1 antibody), exemestane (nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor), and leuprolide (gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist) for 15 patients with premenopausal ER+/HER2- MBC who had failed one to two lines of hormone therapy (HT) without chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival rate at 8 months (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Advanced breast cancer is an incurable disease, with a median overall survival of 3 years, including in countries without access problems. Although chemotherapy is reserved in some cases, it is still used in many countries as a first-line therapy. The aim of our study is to evaluate the first-line treatment choices and the factors that influence therapeutic decisions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

For two decades the ASCO CAP HER2 testing criteria have included 0 and 1+ scores, but this distinction was inconsequential. Now, based on the DESTINY Breast-04 Trial (DB-04) results, for patients with metastatic breast cancer it underpins eligibility for T-DXd treatment. Discerning 0 from 1+ IHC staining is challenging, as HER2 low is not a biologically distinct cancer subset, there are no reference standards or controls and second-tier tests do not apply.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In the DESTINY-B04 trial, patients with pretreated HER2 low metastatic breast cancer (defined as immunohistochemistry score of 1+ or 2+ and negative in situ hybridization) had significant survival improvement with Trastuzumab therapy.

Methods: The goal of our study was to compare the HER2 immunohistochemistry scores of paired primary and metastatic breast cancer, with emphasis on HER2 low criteria and its implications for detailed immunohistochemistry interpretation. Using the pathology database from 2011, we identified 272 cases of primary breast cancers with paired metastases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!