Background: Preserving the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) in breast cancer surgery improves patient satisfaction and quality of life. The oncologic safety of NSM in tumors < 2 cm from the nipple remains in question. We conducted a systematic review to determine whether TND < 2 cm was associated with increased risk of LRR in patients undergoing NSM.
Methods: We included studies of invasive or in situ breast cancer < 2 cm from NAC undergoing NSM which reported LRR rates. LRR rates were stratified by TND and culminated across studies. Cohort study quality was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Criteria. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity in reporting survival outcomes.
Results: We identified seven retrospective cohort studies with 2295 patients and 18 case series with 3507 patients. Direct tumor involvement of NAC was considered an absolute contraindication to NSM in all studies. In cohort studies, median follow-up was 31-112 (range 14-204) months. Cohorts with TND < 2 cm did not have a significantly higher rate of LRR. Amongst case series, 275 patients had TND < 2 cm. Combined LRR in case series was 2.6%, with median follow-up 10.4-71 (range 0-158) months.
Conclusions: Our systematic review did not identify TND < 2 cm as a significant risk factor for LRR. NSM appears oncologically safe in select patients with TND < 2 cm. Given the improved quality of life associated with NSM compared to skin-sparing mastectomy, we suggest NSM as the procedure of choice in appropriately selected patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14143-6 | DOI Listing |
Plast Surg (Oakv)
February 2025
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Reconstructed breast with silicone breast implants (SBIs) after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) provides high patient satisfaction from a cosmetic point of view, but low patient satisfaction with respect to hypoesthesia of the reconstructed breast, and reinnervation is required. Currently, few reports are available on reinnervation in breast reconstruction with implants, and detailed data on desensitization of reconstructed breasts are lacking. Therefore, we examined perceptual data after NSM with respect to reinnervation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Surg (Oakv)
February 2025
Plastic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Plast Reconstr Surg
January 2025
Department of General Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
The single port robotic nipple sparing mastectomy (SPrNSM) was recently introduced. This approach is safe and has led to favorable outcomes in relation to cosmetic result, patient satisfaction, and breast sensation. The typical reconstruction with all robotic nipple sparing mastectomies is implant based; however, this is not always what a patient desires.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg
February 2025
From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Learning Objectives: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) Understand the unique differences between mastopexy in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. (2) Describe the approach to performing mastopexy with autoaugmentation or after explantation. (3) Have insight into the approach and decision-making process for performing mastopexy with nipple-sparing mastectomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Surg Oncol
January 2025
Breast Surgery Section, Division of GI and Oncologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!