A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Accuracy and availability of automated urine output monitoring in the operating room using a smart scale. | LitMetric

Accuracy and availability of automated urine output monitoring in the operating room using a smart scale.

Adv Med Sci

Healthcare Data Science Center, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, South Korea; Innovative Medical Device Demonstration Support Center, Biomedical Research Institute, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, South Korea. Electronic address:

Published: September 2023

Purpose: Urine output (UO) is an important intraoperative parameter that is not yet electronically monitored. We compared an automatic urinometer (AU) based on a smart scale with a manual urinometer (MU).

Patients And Methods: This prospective study investigated the hourly UO of 35 preoperative patients with an indwelling urinary catheter using AU, MU, and cylinder measurements. Data were analyzed using the Bland-Altman method. A questionnaire related to the use of the AU was completed by medical staff (n=25).

Results: Compared to the cylinder measurements, the differences in measurements by the AU and the MU were -6.31 ​± ​15.03 ​mL/h (p=0.018) and 20.26 ​± ​26.81 ​mL/h (p=0.001), respectively. The r values for the comparison of cylinder measurements with AU and MU values were 0.985 (p<0.001) and 0.968 (p<0.001), respectively. Bland-Altman analyses showed that cylinder measurements had better agreement with the AU measurements than with the MU measurements. Also, the medical staff reported that the use of the AU was easier to learn than the use of the MU (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Compared to the MU values, AU values were noninferior; they had significantly less bias and temporal deviation. Additionally, the medical staff reported that the use of the AU was easier to learn than the use of the MU.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advms.2023.07.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cylinder measurements
12
urine output
8
smart scale
8
accuracy availability
4
availability automated
4
automated urine
4
output monitoring
4
monitoring operating
4
operating room
4
room smart
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!