A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Characteristics of the quick repeat-recall test (Q-RRT). | LitMetric

Objective: To determine the reliability and validity of the Quick Repeat-Recall Test (Q-RRT).

Design: Within-subject repeated measures. Participants completed the Q-RRT at a speech level of 75 dB SPL in 2 noise configurations at signal-to-noise ratios of 5, 10, and 15 dB in a counterbalanced order, along with the full-RRT. The Q-RRT was repeated after 1-3 weeks to estimate within-session and between-session reliability. Participants also completed external validation measures relating speech-in-noise ability (Hearing-In-Noise Test, HINT), memory (Reading Span Test, RST; Forward Digit Span Test, DST-F), and noise acceptance (Tracking of Noise Tolerance, TNT).

Study Sample: Twenty-five normal-hearing listeners (mean age = 63.9 years).

Results: Group and scores were similar between the full-RRT and the Q-RRT. However, and ratings were significantly poorer for the full-RRT than the Q-RRT. The average scores correlated with the HINT scores, while the scores correlated with the DST-F and RST scores. ratings also correlated with the TNT scores. Within-session and between-session test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients were fair-to-excellent (0.41-0.91) depending on the outcome measures.

Conclusions: The Q-RRT is a reliable and valid measure of speech-in-noise ability, working memory, listening effort, and noise acceptance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2023.2245969DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

full-rrt q-rrt
12
quick repeat-recall
8
repeat-recall test
8
participants completed
8
within-session between-session
8
speech-in-noise ability
8
span test
8
noise acceptance
8
scores correlated
8
q-rrt
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!