AI Article Synopsis

  • Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients with acute coronary syndrome shows potential benefits, including reduced risks of major cardiovascular events and bleeding compared to standard DAPT.
  • A systematic review covered 32 randomized controlled trials with nearly 104,000 patients, analyzing various DAPT strategies, including short-term therapy and unguided de-escalation.
  • Results indicated that unguided de-escalation reduced major adverse cardiovascular events and showed a better safety profile, making it a strong candidate for treatment protocols over standard approaches.

Article Abstract

Background: Short-term (≤6 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and DAPT de-escalation become attractive for patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Methods: A systemic search identified randomized controlled trials that included patients with acute coronary syndrome treated using (1) standard DAPT (12 months) with clopidogrel, prasugrel (standard/low dose), or ticagrelor; (2) extended DAPT (≥18 months); (3) short-term DAPT (≤6 months) followed by P2Y inhibitor or aspirin; (4) 12-month DAPT with unguided de-escalation from potent P2Y inhibitors to low-dose potent P2Y inhibitor or clopidogrel at 1 month; and (5) guided selection DAPT with genotype or platelet function tests. The primary efficacy outcome (major adverse cardiovascular events) was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety outcome was major or minor bleeding.

Results: This meta-analysis included 32 randomized controlled trials with 103 497 patients. While there were no differences in efficacy between short, unguided de-escalation and guided selection strategies, unguided de-escalation was associated with reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with standard DAPT with clopidogrel or ticagrelor (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.67 [0.49-0.93] and 0.68 [0.50-0.93]). Both short DAPT followed by P2Y inhibitor and unguided de-escalation were associated with reduced risks in safety compared with other strategies, including guided selection (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.66 [0.47-0.93] and 0.48 [0.33-0.71]). Short DAPT followed by a P2Y inhibitor was associated with reduced risk of major bleeding and all-cause death compared with standard, extended DAPT (eg, versus DAPT with clopidogrel; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.64 [0.42-0.97] and 0.60 [0.44-0.82]). By rankogram, unguided de-escalation strategy was the safest and most effective strategy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events and major or minor bleeding while short DAPT followed by P2Y inhibitor was ranked the best for major bleeding and all-cause death.

Conclusions: In patients with acute coronary syndrome, unguided de-escalation was associated with the lowest risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and major or minor bleeding outcomes, while short DAPT followed by P2Y inhibitor was associated with the lowest risk of major bleeding and all-cause death.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013242DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

p2y inhibitor
24
unguided de-escalation
24
patients acute
16
acute coronary
16
major adverse
16
adverse cardiovascular
16
cardiovascular events
16
risk major
16
short dapt
16
dapt p2y
16

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!