Background: Few evidence-based suggestions are available to help applicants and mentors improve reapplication outcomes. We sought to provide program directors' (PDs) perspectives on actionable steps to improve reapplicants' chances for a match.

Methods: The PDs were asked to rank positions unmatched applicants can pursue, steps these applicants can take for the next application cycle, and reasons why reapplicants do not match.

Results: Responses from 66 of 123 PDs were received (53.6% response rate). Obtaining new recommendation letters and rotating with orthopaedics were the highest 20 ranked steps unmatched applicants can take. No curriculum vitae (CV) improvement, poor interview, and poor letters of recommendation were the most important reasons hindering applicants from matching when reapplying.

Conclusions: Steps reapplicants could prioritize include obtaining new recommendation letters, rotating in orthopaedics, and producing new research items. CV strengthening and improving interview skills address the 2 main reasons why unmatched applicants failed in subsequent attempts.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10438795PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00044DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unmatched applicants
12
obtaining recommendation
8
recommendation letters
8
letters rotating
8
rotating orthopaedics
8
applicants
6
reimagining path
4
unmatched
4
path unmatched
4
unmatched orthopaedic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!