Comparison of concentration and extraction workflows for qPCR quantification of intI1 and vanA in untreated wastewater.

Sci Total Environ

CSIRO Environment, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia. Electronic address:

Published: December 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the use of quantitative PCR (qPCR) to measure antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in untreated municipal wastewater, aiming to address the antimicrobial resistance crisis.
  • It emphasizes the need for consistent qPCR workflows by testing various sample volumes, membrane types, and DNA extraction kits to effectively capture ARGs like 16S rRNA, intI1, and vanA from wastewater samples.
  • Results showed that using 0.20-/0.40-μm polycarbonate membranes and the DNeasy PowerWater Kit improved detection and quantification of these genes, highlighting that workflow performance varies significantly depending on methods and sample sizes.

Article Abstract

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) measurement of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in untreated municipal wastewater may prove useful in combating the antimicrobial resistance crisis. However, harmonizing and optimizing qPCR-based workflows is essential to facilitate comparisons across studies, and includes achieving highly-effective ARG capture through efficient concentration and extraction procedures. In the current study, combinations of sample volume, membrane types and DNA extraction kits within filtration and centrifugation-based workflows were used to quantify 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA), class 1 integron-integrase gene (intI1) and an ARG encoding resistance to vancomycin (vanA) in untreated wastewater sampled from three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Highly abundant 16S rRNA and intI1 were detected in 100 % of samples from all three WWTPs using both 2 and 20 mL sample volumes, while lower prevalence vanA was only detected when using the 20 mL volume. When filtering 2 mL of wastewater, workflows with 0.20-/0.40-μm polycarbonate (PC) membranes generally yielded greater concentrations of the three targets than workflows with 0.22-/0.45-μm mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membranes. The improved performance was diminished when the sample volume was increased to 20 mL. Consistently greater concentrations of 16S rRNA, intI1 and vanA were yielded by filtration-based workflows using PC membranes combined with a DNeasy PowerWater (DPW) Kit, regardless of the sample volume used, and centrifugation-based workflows with DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit for 2-mL wastewater extractions. Within the filtration-based workflows, the DPW kit yielded more detection and quantifiable results for less abundant vanA than the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit and FastDNA™ SPIN Kit for Soil. These findings indicate that the performance of qPCR-based workflows for surveillance of ARGs in wastewater varies across targets, sample volumes, concentration methods and extraction kits. Workflows must be carefully considered and validated considering the target ARGs to be monitored.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166442DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sample volume
12
16s rrna
12
workflows
10
concentration extraction
8
inti1 vana
8
vana untreated
8
untreated wastewater
8
qpcr-based workflows
8
extraction kits
8
centrifugation-based workflows
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!