Background: The sepsis screening tool is essential because it enables the rapid identification of high-risk patients and facilitates prompt treatment. Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a widely used screening tool for sepsis. However, it has limitations in predicting patient prognosis. We developed the S-S.M.A.R.T (epsis evaluation with hock index, ental status, ge, and index on riage) and aimed at evaluating it as a screening tool for patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department.
Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department. We compared the prognosis prediction abilities of the S-S.M.A.R.T and qSOFA scores in patients with suspected sepsis. The primary outcome was 7-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and ICU admission. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the chi-square test were used.
Results: In total, 401 patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 72.2 ± 15.6 years, and 213 (53.1%) of them were female. The S-S.M.A.R.T had superior predictive ability for prognosis of patients with suspected sepsis compared to qSOFA (area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.789 vs. 0.699; =0.02 for 7-day mortality, AUC of 0.786 vs. 0.681; < 0.001 for 30-day mortality, AUC 0.758 vs 0.717; =0.05 for ICU admission).
Conclusion: The S-S.M.A.R.T can be useful in predicting the prognosis of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435300 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8852135 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!