A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A correction algorithm for improved magnetic field monitoring with distal field probes. | LitMetric

A correction algorithm for improved magnetic field monitoring with distal field probes.

Magn Reson Med

Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Published: December 2023

Purpose: A significant source of artifacts in MRI are field fluctuations. Field monitoring is a new technology that allows measurement of field dynamics during a scan via "field probes," which can be used to improve image reconstruction. Ideally, probes are located within the volume where gradients produce nominally linear field patterns. However, in some situations probes must be located far from isocenter where rapid field variation can arise, leading to erroneous field-monitoring characterizations and images. This work aimed to develop an algorithm that improves the robustness of field dynamics in these situations.

Methods: The algorithm is split into three components. Component 1 calculates field dynamics one spatial order at a time, whereas the second implements a weighted least squares solution based on probe distance. Component 3 then calculates phase residuals and removes the residual phase for distant probes before recalculation. Two volunteers and a phantom were scanned on a 7T MRI using diffusion-weighted sequences, and field monitoring was performed. Image reconstructions were informed with field dynamics calculated conventionally, and with the correction algorithm, after which in vivo images were compared qualitatively and phantom image error was quantitatively assessed.

Results: The algorithm was able to correct corrupted field dynamics, resulting in image-quality improvements. Significant artifact reduction was observed when correcting higher-order fits. Stepwise fitting provided the most correction benefit, which was marginally improved when adding the other correction strategies.

Conclusion: The proposed algorithm can mitigate effects of phase errors in field monitoring, providing improved characterization of field dynamics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29781DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

field dynamics
24
field monitoring
16
field
14
correction algorithm
8
probes located
8
component calculates
8
dynamics
6
algorithm
5
correction
4
algorithm improved
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!