Background: Although partial nephrectomy has become the gold standard for T1 renal tumors whenever technically feasible, simple enucleation has shown superior results. To the best of our knowledge, no randomized controlled trials comparing these two surgical approaches have been published.

Objective: To compare the surgical margin status for robot-assisted simple enucleation (RASE) and standard robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (sRAPN) for clinical T1 renal tumors.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. A total of 380 patients aged 18-80 yr with newly diagnosed, sporadic, unilateral clinical T1 renal tumors (RENAL score <10) were enrolled and randomized to RASE or sRAPN. The primary endpoint was the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate, with a noninferiority margin of 7.5% set. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03624673).

Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis: We defined noninferiority for RASE versus standard RAPN as an upper 95% confidence interval (CI) bound of <7.5% for the difference in the proportion of patients with a PSM.

Results And Limitations: A cohort of 380 patients was enrolled and randomly assigned to RASE (n = 190) or sRAPN (n = 190). On intention-to-treat analysis for patients with malignant tumors, 2.3% of patients in the RASE group and 3.0% in the sRAPN group had a PSM. The RASE group showed noninferiority to the sRAPN group within a 7.5% margin (difference -0.7%, 95% CI -4.0% to 2.7%). Per-protocol analysis also demonstrated noninferiority of RASE. The RASE group had a shorter median operative time (145 vs 155 min; p = 0.018) and a lower rate of tumor bed suturing (8.9% vs 43%; p < 0.001) in comparison to the sRAPN group. Estimated blood loss was considerably lower in the sRAPN group than in the RASE group (p = 0.046). The rate of recurrence did not differ between the groups (p > 0.9).

Conclusions: RASE for the management of low- to intermediate-complexity tumors is noninferior to sRAPN in terms of the PSM rate. Long-term follow-up is needed to draw conclusions regarding oncological outcomes.

Patient Summary: We carried out a trial to compare simple tumor enucleation versus partial nephrectomy for renal tumors. The outcome we assessed was the proportion of patients with a positive surgical margin. Our results show that simple tumor enucleation is not inferior to partial nephrectomy for this outcome. Longer follow-up is needed to assess other cancer control outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

simple enucleation
12
partial nephrectomy
12
clinical renal
12
renal tumors
12
randomized controlled
12
robot-assisted simple
8
standard robot-assisted
8
robot-assisted partial
8
controlled noninferiority
8
noninferiority trial
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Minimally invasive simple prostatectomy (MISP) and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) are appropriate candidates for the large prostate. However, their comparative effectiveness and safety remain unclear. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of MISP and EEP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Simultaneous reconstruction after removal of nasal silicone implants was published as diced, autologous rib and ear auricular cartilages, and each had their shortcomings. Temporoparietal fascial grafts were used for facial and nasal contouring, vascularized tissue coverage, and augmentation the nose, lip. The temporoparietal fascia graft may be considered for in-time replacement of allografts and remaining bulkiness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) have emerged as the two surgical treatments of medication-refractory benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The comparative outcomes of en-bloc HoLEP with early apical release and RASP with modified Freyer's technique remain unexplored. Between 2018 and 2022, patients with medication-refractory BPH and prostate volume ≥80 g underwent HoLEP or RASP depending on clinical characteristics, patient choice, and surgeon preference.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Despite being less common in recent years, recurrent pleomorphic adenoma still poses a surgical challenge, especially after improper surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively recruited all patients with recurrent pleomorphic adenoma and Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma from February 2007 to April 2024 who were operated upon in a tertiary cancer center. Epidemiological, radiological, and pathological data, risk factors, details of surgical treatment, and surgical/oncological outcomes were analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BPH is a common urological pathology that affects 2480 per 100,000 men worldwide. With a rising population and increased age expectancy, the prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is increasing (Awedew et al. in Lancet Healthy Longev 3(11), 2022).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!