A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Role of 68Ga FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Liver Metastases in Different Types of Cancer. | LitMetric

Objective: We compared the diagnostic accuracies of Ga FAPI-04 PET/CT and F-FDG PET/CT for detecting liver metastases (LMs) in patients with different cancer types.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study included 63 patients with liver lesions who underwent F-FDG PET/CT and Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT between May 2020 and May 2022. Patients with histopathologically confirmed primary diagnoses, data that could be accessed retrospectively, liver lesions confirmed by biopsy over at least 3-6 months of follow-up (via ultrasonography, CT, magnetic resonance imaging, PET/CT, or laboratory tests) were included. Patients with secondary malignancies or primary liver malignancies, and/or who could not be followed-up, were excluded.

Results: Of the 63 total patients, 34 (54%) were female, and the mean age was 61 (30-92) years. There were 582 LMs in 51 patients and 35 benign liver lesions in 20 (12 patients had only benign and 8 both benign and malignant lesions). Of the 582 LMs, 472 (81.1%) evidenced F-FDG uptake and 572 (98.2%) Ga-FAPI uptake. The diagnostic accuracies of Ga-FAPI PET/CT and F-FDG PET/CT were 98% and 82%, respectively (p < 0.001; McNemar test). When the LMs were compared, the maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) value was significantly higher on F-FDG PET/CT than Ga-FAPI PET/CT (median: 6.0 vs. 5.4; p = 0.016). However, the LM-to-background ratio (TBR) was significantly higher on Ga-FAPI PET/CT than F-FDG PET/CT (median: 4.1 vs. 2.1; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Ga-FAPI PET/CT detected more LMs than did F-FDG PET/CT, and TBR was significantly higher on Ga-FAPI PET/CT than F-FDG PET/CT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2127-7699DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

f-fdg pet/ct
28
ga-fapi pet/ct
20
pet/ct
16
pet/ct f-fdg
16
liver lesions
12
pet/ct detecting
8
detecting liver
8
liver metastases
8
diagnostic accuracies
8
f-fdg
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!