Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Iron is a vital element for the growth of bacteria. Bacteria use several strategies to scavenge iron, such as siderophores, which are thought to be important virulence components. The mammalian host uses various iron-binding substances to make iron unavailable for bacterial uptake. Deferoxamine (DFO) is a semi-synthetic iron chelator that has been licensed for medical use. Iron chelators like DFO may provide an alternative therapeutic technique for treating Gram-negative bacteria infections, which frequently display multidrug resistance.
Objectives: We assumed that iron deprivation or interactions with the cell membrane caused by DFO or increased siderophore synthesis may cause the inhibition or inactivation of proteins and enzymes necessary for critical processes in bacteria. Additionally, we proposed that these bacterial alterations might be the origin of synergistic interactions between DFO and several antibiotics.
Material And Methods: To test this hypothesis, we used disc diffusion, broth microdilution and checkerboard synergy testing methods on combinations of DFO with ceftriaxone, cefepime, meropenem, amikacin, levofloxacin, and tigecycline, respectively, in a total of 55 isolates (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Proteus mirabilis strains - 11 isolates for each genus).
Results: No synergistic or antagonistic interactions were observed between DFO and the tested antibiotics in the E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii isolates, while the addition of DFO significantly increased the inhibition zone diameters of cefepime, amikacin, meropenem, tigecycline, and levofloxacin in P. mirabilis isolates. According to the checkerboard synergy results, a synergistic interaction was found between DFO and tigecycline, cefepime and amikacin for P. mirabilis isolates.
Conclusions: Among the investigated bacteria, a synergy between antibiotics and DFO was only discovered against P. mirabilis. We do not believe that this entirely disproves our hypothesis, though. The production of siderophores triggered by the increased metabolic activity of actively proliferating bacteria at the infection site may provide better results. Therefore, expanding these investigations and developing infection models through animal testing would be advantageous.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.17219/acem/169794 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!