The effects of topping-off instrumentation on biomechanics of sacroiliac joint after lumbosacral fusion.

Comput Biol Med

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China; Research Institute for Sports Science and Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.

Published: September 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines the effects of a topping-off device used during lumbosacral fusion on the biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ).
  • After simulating the addition of the Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM), the results showed that the range of motion (ROM) in the SIJ increased significantly compared to fusion without DIAM.
  • Increased motion and ligament strain at SIJ suggest a potential greater risk for degeneration and pain when using topping-off devices alongside lumbosacral fusion.

Article Abstract

Background: Lumbar/lumbosacral fusion supplemented with topping-off devices has been proposed with the aim of avoiding adjacent segment degeneration proximal to the fusion construct. However, it remains unclear how the biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) are altered after topping-off surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects of topping-off instrumentation on SIJ after lumbosacral fusion.

Methods: The validated finite element model of an intact lumbar spine-pelvis segment was modified to simulate L5-S1 interbody fusion fixed with a pedicle screw system. An interspinous spacer, Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM), was used as a topping-off device and placed between interspinous processes of the L4 and L5 segments. Range of motion (ROM), von-Mises stress distribution, and ligament strain at SIJ were compared between fusion (without DIAM) and topping-off (fusion with DIAM) models under moments of four physiological motions.

Results: ROM at the left and right SIJs in the topping-off model was higher by 26.9% and 27.5% in flexion, 16.8% and 16.1% in extension, 18.8% and 15.8% in lateral bending, and 3.7% and 7.4% in axial rotation, respectively, compared to those in the fusion model. The predicted stress and strain data showed that under all physiological loads, the topping-off model exhibited higher stress and ligament strain at the SIJs than the fusion model.

Conclusions: Motion, stress, and ligament strain at SIJ increase when supplementing lumbosacral fusion with topping-off devices, suggesting that topping-off surgery may be associated with higher risks of SIJ degeneration and pain than fusion alone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107357DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ligament strain
12
fusion
10
topping-off
9
effects topping-off
8
topping-off instrumentation
8
biomechanics sacroiliac
8
sacroiliac joint
8
lumbosacral fusion
8
topping-off devices
8
topping-off surgery
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!