Across the lifespan, individuals frequently choose between exploiting known rewarding options or exploring unknown alternatives. A large body of work has suggested that children may explore more than adults. However, because novelty and reward uncertainty are often correlated, it is unclear how they differentially influence decision-making across development. Here, children, adolescents, and adults (ages 8-27 years, = 122) completed an adapted version of a recently developed value-guided decision-making task that decouples novelty and uncertainty. In line with prior studies, we found that exploration decreased with increasing age. Critically, participants of all ages demonstrated a similar bias to select choice options with greater novelty, whereas aversion to reward uncertainty increased into adulthood. Computational modeling of participant choices revealed that whereas adolescents and adults demonstrated attenuated uncertainty aversion for more novel choice options, children's choices were not influenced by reward uncertainty.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10431916PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84260DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reward uncertainty
12
novelty uncertainty
8
adolescents adults
8
choice options
8
uncertainty
5
novelty
4
uncertainty differentially
4
differentially drive
4
drive exploration
4
exploration development
4

Similar Publications

Background: Little attention has been paid to the experiences of clinicians and health personnel who provide heroin-assisted treatment (HAT). This study provides the first empirical findings about the clinicians' experiences of providing HAT in the Norwegian context.

Methods: 23 qualitative interviews were conducted with 31 clinicians shortly after HAT clinics opened in Norway's two largest cities: Oslo and Bergen.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Competition increases the magnitude of dishonest reporting even when controlling for reward uncertainty.

Sci Rep

December 2024

Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Does competition increase cheating? This question has been investigated by both psychologists and economists in the past and received conflicting answers. Notably, prior experimental work compared how people behaved under competitive and non-competitive tasks that were associated with different levels of uncertainty about the reward that people would receive. We aim to experimentally disentangle the effect of competition from the effects of uncertain rewards.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Perceived fatigue does not alter effort-based decision making but does undermine confidence in the ability to perform physical actions.

Physiol Behav

December 2024

Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; Department of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, UK.

Fatigue may affect the decision to deploy effort (cost) for a given rewarded outcome (benefit). However, it remains unclear whether these fatigue-associated changes can be attributed to simply feeling fatigued. To investigate this question, twenty-two healthy males made a series of choices between two rewarded options: a fixed, no effort option, where no physical effort was required to obtain a set, low reward vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Adaptive mechanisms of learning models play critical roles in interpreting adaptive behavior of humans and animals. Different learning models, varying from Bayesian models, deep learning or regression models to reward-based reinforcement learning models, adopt similar update rules. These update rules can be reduced to the same generalized mathematical form: the Rescorla-Wagner equation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unconscious will as a neurobehavioral mechanism against adversity.

Neurosci Biobehav Rev

December 2024

Department of Biopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum,  Universitätsstraße 150, Bochum 44801, Germany. Electronic address:

Incentive salience theory both explains the directional component of motivation (in terms of cue attraction or "wanting") and its energetic component, as a function of the strength of cue attraction. This theory characterizes cue- and reward-triggered approach behavior. But it does not tell us how behavior can show enhanced vigor under reward uncertainty, when cues are inconsistent or resources hidden.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!