AI Article Synopsis

  • Horseback riders (HR) demonstrate different sensory control of balance compared to judokas (JU) and non-athletes (NA), particularly in how they manage stability under various conditions like standing still or on an unstable surface.
  • Research involving 34 JU, 27 HR, and 21 NA used specific metrics to measure balance performance, showing that HR had lower center-of-pressure (COP) values in static and dynamic tests compared to JU, indicating better balance.
  • Findings suggest that sensory inputs, especially vision, play a significant role in balance for HR, highlighting the influence of sport-specific experiences on postural control.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Compared to judokas (JU) and non-athletes (NA), horseback riders (HR) may develop specific changes in their sensory control of balance.

Methods: Thirty-four international-level JU, twenty-seven international-level HR and twenty-one NA participated. Participants stood upright on a plateform (static condition) or on a seesaw device with an instability along the mediolateral (ML) or the anteroposterior (AP) direction (dynamic conditions). These conditions were carried out with eyes opened (EO) or closed (EC), and with (wF) or without a foam (nF). Experimental variables included conventional (linear), non-linear center-of-pressure (COP) parameters, Romberg Quotient (RQ) and Plantar Quotient (PQ).

Results: Group effects. COP Surface (COPS) and standard deviation of COP along AP (SDY) were lower in HR than in JU in Static. SD Y was lower in HR than in JU in Dynamic AP. COP velocity (COPV) was lower in both HR and JU than in NA in Static and Dynamic. Sample entropy along AP and ML (SampEnY and SampEnX) were higher in HR than in JU in Static. SampEnY was higher in HR than in JU in Dynamic ML. Sensory effects. In EC, COPV was lower in JU than in NA in Dynamic AP, and lower in JU than in both HR and NA in Dynamic ML. In EO, COPV was lower in both JU and HR than in NA in Dynamic ML. RQ applied to COPS was lower in JU than in both HR and NA in Dynamic AP, and lower in JU than in HR in Dynamic ML. RQ applied to COPV was lower in JU than in both HR and NA in Static and Dynamic. PQ applied to COPS was higher in JU than in both HR and NA in Dynamic ML.

Conclusion: Results showed that the effects of sport expertise on postural control could only be revealed with specific COP variables and were directionally oriented and sport-dependant. HR seem to rely more on vision than JU, thus revealing that the contribution of the sensory inputs to balance control is also sport-dependent. Results open up new knowledge on the specificity of sport practice on multisensory balance information during upright posture.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423814PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1213385DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lower dynamic
24
copv lower
16
lower static
12
dynamic applied
12
dynamic
11
lower
9
sensory control
8
balance upright
8
upright posture
8
horseback riders
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!