AI Article Synopsis

  • Lesion size is crucial for determining treatment and predicting outcomes for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs), yet traditional MRI often over or underestimates sizes compared to surgical measurements.
  • This study compared the accuracy of the surface microscopy coil (SMC) MRI to conventional MRI methods in assessing OLT sizes before surgery, involving 43 patients from 2019 to 2022.
  • Results indicated that SMC measurements were significantly more accurate than those from conventional coils (ASC), with 39 out of 43 SMC assessments aligned with surgical measurements, while only 26 out of 43 from ASC showed consistency.

Article Abstract

Background: Lesion size is a major determinant of treatment strategies and predictor of clinical outcomes for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been commonly used in the preoperative evaluation of OLTs, MRI has low reliability and usually overestimates or underestimates lesion size compared with intraoperative assessment. This study aims to determine whether the surface microscopy coil (SMC) can improve the accuracy of assessment of preoperative OLTs compared with conventional coil MRI, ankle joint special phased array coil (ASC).

Methods: A total of 43 patients diagnosed with OLTs undertook preoperative MRI examination with both SMC and ASC were included in this prospective study from 2019 to 2022. The diameter of the lesion was measured in sagittal plane and coronal plane at its widest point and then the lesion area was calculated. Then MRI measurements were compared with arthroscopy or open-surgery measurements.

Results: The mean lesion area measured with ASC was significantly greater than that measured intraoperatively (95.07±44.60 . 52.74±29.86 mm, P<0.001), while there was no significant difference between lesion area measured in SMC and intraoperatively (55.28±36.06 . 52.74±29.86 mm, P=0.576). Diameter measured in ASC was significantly greater than that measured intraoperatively in both coronal plane (8.95±2.48 . 6.67±1.81, P<0.001) and sagittal plane (13.12±3.76 . 9.58±3.98, P<0.001). No significant difference between lesion diameter measured in SMC and intraoperatively in both coronal plane (6.44±2.59 . 6.67±1.81, P=0.608) or sagittal plane (10.23±3.69 . 9.58±3.98, P=0.194). Compared with surgical assessment, 39 of 43 cases were consistent with SMC assessment while only 26 of 43 cases were consistent with ASC assessment (39/43 . 26/43, P=0.002).

Conclusions: Diameter measured with SMC was much more accurate than ASC MRI. Compared with ASC MRI, the SMC had a much higher concordance rate between preoperative assessment and surgical assessment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423370PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-1202DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surface microscopy
8
microscopy coil
8
ankle joint
8
joint special
8
special phased
8
phased array
8
array coil
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
osteochondral lesions
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!