Cirrhosis continues to claim the lives of people worldwide every year. Esophageal variceal bleeding due to portal hypertension is one of the dreadful complications. We compared carvedilol with propranolol to find better drug that can prevent index variceal bleed in cirrhotic patients. 220 patients with known esophageal varices on upper GI endoscopy and no previous history of GI bleed were randomized to group A (Carvedilol) and group B (Propranolol). Bleeding occurred in 37.14% and 59.04% of the patients in group A (carvedilol) and B (propranolol) respectively (p=0.02). Bleeding was more common among patients with large as compared to small varices (67.04% versus 35.48% respectively). Among patients with large varices bleeding occurred in 58.13% and 75.55% of patients in group A and B respectively while in small varices, bleeding rate was 25% and 46.66% respectively (p=0.03). Regarding the response of beta blockers, mean pulse rate dropped from 85.15±5.49 to 59.8±2.39 per minute in Group A while in Group B it was reduced to 60.5±4.21 from 83.8±5.33 per minute at 3 years follow up. No significant difference found in the side effect profile. Our study showed that carvedilol was more effective than propranolol in primary prevention of variceal hemorrhage.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

carvedilol propranolol
12
propranolol primary
8
esophageal variceal
8
variceal bleed
8
bleed cirrhotic
8
cirrhotic patients
8
group carvedilol
8
bleeding occurred
8
patients group
8
patients large
8

Similar Publications

Background: This case highlights the management of concomitant acute myocarditis and congenital long QT syndrome with electrical storm and incessant Torsade de Pointes.

Case Presentation: An 18 years-old Southeast Asian para 1 abortus 0 (P1A0) postpartum patient with cesarean section owing to severe preeclampsia, acute lymphocytic myocarditis, and prolonged QT interval owing to long QT syndrome. She has incessant Torsade de Pointes treated with beta-blocker, lidocaine, overdrive pacing with a temporary transvenous pacemaker, left cardiac sympathetic denervation per video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Carvedilol vs. propranolol for the prevention of decompensation and mortality in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis.

J Hepatol

December 2024

Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Clinical and Translational Research in Digestive Diseases, Valdecilla Research Institute (IDIVAL), Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain.

Background And Aims: Data on the effectiveness of classical non-selective beta-blockers (cNSBB, i.e., propranolol and nadolol) versus carvedilol in patients with cirrhosis are scarce.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Real-world research on beta-blocker usage trends in China and safety exploration based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

BMC Pharmacol Toxicol

November 2024

Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 119 Nansihuan West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, P. R. China.

Background: Beta-blockers are widely used, with continuously updated clinical recommendations. However, their application faces challenges in personalized treatment and safety. The study aimed to investigate the frequency and patterns of prescribing beta-blockers in China and to explore potential adverse event risk signals associated with beta-blockers, providing reference for rational medication use in clinical settings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Aims: Carvedilol is a non-selective β-blocker (NSBBs) with anti-α1-adrenergic activity, more effective than traditional NSBBs in reducing portal-pressure (HVPG). However, 35%-45% of patients still have insufficient HVPG-decrease. Statins ameliorate endothelial dysfunction, reduce hepatic vascular resistance, and have pleiotropic effects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This publication is the first to report current, global, pediatric oral extemporaneous compounding practices. Complete survey responses were received from 479 participants actively involved in compounding across all the World Health Organization (WHO) regions. The survey addressed oral formulation of extemporaneous liquids, including the use of commercial or in-house vehicles, flavoring excipients, source of formulation recipes, and beyond use dates (BUDs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!