Survey on the Impact of COVID-19 on the Practice of Assisted Reproduction in Latin America.

JBRA Assist Reprod

Programa de Etica y Politicas Publicas en Reproducción Humana, Facultad de Medicina Universidad Diego Portales. Director del Registro Latinoamericano de Reproducción Asistida, Chile.

Published: September 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic affected assisted reproductive technology practices at centers in Latin America during 2020.
  • An online survey was conducted among fertility clinics from July to December 2020, revealing that most centers paused operations early in the pandemic, with the highest response rate from Brazil.
  • By December, almost all centers had reopened and resumed treatments, but the number of ART cycles performed remained significantly lower than pre-pandemic levels.

Article Abstract

Objective: To follow the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the practice of assisted reproductive technology in centers reporting to the Latin American Registry during 2020.

Methods: An internally validated online survey designed on the Survey Monkey platform with a maximum of 20 closed questions was sent via e-mail or WhatsApp to the clinical director of each center reporting to the Latin American Registry of Assisted Reproduction between July and December 2020.

Results: The number of centers responding to the survey varied during the six months. The relative contribution of Brazil to all responses was 41.4% to 45%, followed by México (16.2% to 23.8%), Argentina (8.1% to 12.6%), Colombia (7.1% to 8.2%), Chile (3.6% to 6.1%) and Peru (4.0% to 4.9%). Most centers reported stopping activities before July 2020 (81%). COVID-19 related symptoms were a criterion on their own to postpone ovarian stimulation (80.1% to 87.7% of centers). Although in July only 76 of 166 centers (45.8%) performed embryo transfers, by October 104 of 109 centers (95.4%) performed them. In survey 6 (December), 78 of 79 centers (98.7%) that had initially closed had already reopened, although 62.3% (61 of 98 centers) still performed 80% or less of their usual number of ART cycles.

Conclusions: Most centers modified their clinical practice and applied specific protocols to screen their staff and patients. Suspicion of COVID-19 delayed treatments. Despite a peak of the pandemic, by December most centers were performing all ART treatments, although the number of cycles remained low compared to pre-pandemic numbers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712828PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20230035DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

centers
10
practice assisted
8
assisted reproduction
8
reporting latin
8
latin american
8
american registry
8
december centers
8
survey
5
survey impact
4
impact covid-19
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!