Availability of Specific Programs and Medications for Addiction Treatment to Vulnerable Populations: Results from the Addiction Treatment Locator, Assessment, and Standards (ATLAS) Survey.

J Addict Med

From the Fair Haven Community Health Care, New Haven, CT (BJO); Program in Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (BJO, ETB, DAF); Office of Ambulatory Care and Population Health, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, New York, NY (KC); Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovation, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (KC); Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA (PJJ); Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (DAF); and Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT (DAF).

Published: November 2023

Objectives: This study aimed to describe addiction treatment facilities by their offerings of medications for alcohol use disorder (MAUD) and/or for opioid use disorder (MOUD), and by their offering services to groups with barriers to care: uninsured and publicly insured, youth, seniors, individuals preferring to receive care in Spanish, and sexual minority individuals.

Methods: We examined addiction treatment facility survey data in 6 US states. We performed bivariate analyses comparing facilities that offered MAUD, MOUD, and both (main outcomes). We then constructed a multivariable model to identify predictors of offering MAUD, MOUD, or both, including exposures that demonstrate programming for special populations.

Results: Among 2474 facilities, 1228 (50%) responded between October 2019 and January 2020. Programs were offered for youth (30%), elderly (40%), Spanish-speaking (37%), and sexual minority populations (39%), with 58% providing MAUD, 67% providing MOUD, and 56% providing both. Among those providing MAUD, MOUD, or both, a majority (>60% for all exposures) offered programming to vulnerable populations. With Delaware as reference, Louisiana (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.67) and North Carolina (aOR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15-0.72) facilities had lesser odds of offering both MAUD and MOUD. All exposures identifying facilities offering treatment to vulnerable groups were associated with offerings of MAUD and/or MOUD except for offerings to youth; these facilities had less odds of offering MOUD (aOR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.31-0.62).

Conclusions: There are facility-level disparities in providing MAUD and MOUD by state, and facilities with youth programming have lesser odds of offering MOUD than other facilities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001158DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

maud moud
20
addiction treatment
16
providing maud
12
odds offering
12
moud
10
treatment vulnerable
8
vulnerable populations
8
facilities
8
maud
8
maud and/or
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!