Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The purpose of this study was to develop the assessment of subtalar joint instability with chronic ankle instability (CAI) using ultrasonography. Forty-six patients with anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) abnormalities and a history of ankle sprain were divided into CAI (21.2 ± 5.9 y/o, 7 males and 17 females) and asymptomatic groups (21.0 ± 7.4 y/o, 9 males and 12 females) on the basis of subjective ankle instability assessed using the CAIT and the Ankle Instability Instrument Tool (AIIT). Twenty-six age-matched feet participated in a control group (18.9 ± 7.0 y/o, 9 males and 17 females). Ultrasound measurements of the width of the posterior subtalar joint facet were obtained at rest and maximum ankle inversion (subtalar joint excursion; STJE). The differences in STJE among the three groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA. The relationship between STJE and subjective ankle instability was assessed using Spearman's correlation tests. The STJE value was significantly greater in the CAI group (2.3 ± 0.8 mm) than in the asymptomatic (1.0 ±0.4 mm) and control groups (0.8 ±0.2 mm) ( < 0.001, effect size: 0.64). STJE had significant negative correlations with CAIT (r = -0.71, < 0.01), and significant positive correlations with AIIT (r = 0.74, < 0.01). The cut-off value to distinguish between the CAI and asymptomatic groups was 1.7 mm using the ROC curve.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10418656 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11152227 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!