Magnetic-controlled capsule endoscopy performance in aging patients.

BMC Gastroenterol

Department of Geriatrics, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku St., Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.

Published: August 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the effectiveness of magnetic capsule endoscopy (MCE) in elderly patients, focusing on those aged 60 and older, particularly those over 80.
  • The research found that older patients (≥80 years) had longer esophageal and gastric transit times and poorer gastric cleanliness and visualization scores compared to younger elderly patients (60-79 years).
  • Despite some challenges, MCE proved to be safe and feasible for elderly patients, revealing more positive findings like ulcers and erosions in the oldest group.

Article Abstract

Background: The increasing elderly population and wide use of magnetic capsule endoscopy (MCE) have led to more attention to elderly patients.

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the performance (including transit time, cleanliness score, positive findings and safety) of MCE in aging patients (≥ 60 years), especially patients over 80 years old.

Methods: Consecutive patients of ≥ 60 years undergoing MCE at our center from August 2017 to August 2022 were classified into the oldest (≥ 80 years) and the older (60-79 years) groups. Esophageal transit time (ETT), gastric examination time (GET), small bowel transit time (SITT), and the quality of gastric preparation were compared. Information on examination indications, subjective discomforts, adverse events, and MCE outcomes were compared.

Results: Of 293 enrolled patients, 128 patients were in the oldest group and 165 patients were in the older group. ETT and GET were longer in the oldest group, whereas SITT was slightly longer in the oldest patients. Visualization scores were significantly lower in the body and antrum in the oldest patients. The total visualization score was lower in the older group compared with the oldest group; however, the difference was not significant. Cleanliness scores at the fundus and antrum and total cleanliness scores were lower in the oldest patients compared with the older patients. Positive findings and ulcers and erosions in the small intestine were more common in the oldest group. One patient had nausea during the gastric examination. Capsule retention in the cecum occurred in one case.

Conclusion: MCE was feasible and safe for aging patients. ETT and GET were markedly longer and gastric cleanliness and visualization were worse, while overall small intestine-positive findings were higher in the oldest patients compared with the older patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10422704PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02914-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oldest group
16
oldest patients
16
patients
14
aging patients
12
transit time
12
oldest
9
capsule endoscopy
8
positive findings
8
patients ≥ 60
8
≥ 60 years
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!