AI Article Synopsis

  • Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatics (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) are crucial for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but assessing real-world adherence and treatment longevity is increasingly necessary.
  • A study of 753 RA patients treated with various bDMARDs between 2015-2018 found good adherence rates, but over half of treatment episodes were suspended, with older age showing less suspension risk while more primary care visits and higher comorbidities increased risk.
  • The findings suggest treatment decisions should consider both disease factors and real-world drug performance, indicating future research might focus on patient subgroups to better understand drug survival differences.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatics drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) are important treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). As more of these drugs become available, there is a greater need to assess their real-world adherence and drug survival.

Methods: Treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with RA who initiated treatment with bDMARDs and tofactinib during 2015-2018 in a large Israeli health maintenance organization were included. Adherence and time to treatment suspension were recorded. Odds for adherence were estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model. Risk for treatment suspension was estimated using a mixed-effect Cox proportional hazard model.

Results: The analysis included 753 eligible patients (61.8% treatment-naïve) treated with 1287 treatment episodes (tofacitinib 24.2%, tocilizumab 17.5%, etanercept 16.0%, adalimumab 10.4%, abatacept 9.9%, rituximab 9.0%, golimumab 6.9%, certolizumab pegol 3.6%, infliximab 1.9%, and sarilumab 0.5%). Good adherence was measured for almost all drugs, yet over 50% of all treatment episodes were suspended. Older age was associated with reduced risk for treatment suspension while higher number of primary care visits and higher Charlson's comorbidity score were associated with increased risk. Compared to etanercept, treatment with adalimumab, certolizumab, or rituximab was associated with increased risk for treatment suspension (HR 1.68 95% CI 1.27-2.22, HR 1.62 95% CI 1.00-2.60, and HR 2.72 95% CI 2.02-3.67, respectively).

Conclusion: Treatment choice primarily depends on disease activity and prognosis. Real-world data, showing differences in drug survival of bDMARDs and tsDMARD, can also be used in the variety of considerations when choosing treatment. Future studies could separate patients with RA into subgroups, which would also account for potential drug survival differences and enable personalized therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499743PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-023-02607-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment suspension
16
drug survival
12
risk treatment
12
treatment
10
real-world data
8
adherence drug
8
treatment-naïve treatment-experienced
8
rheumatoid arthritis
8
treatment episodes
8
associated increased
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!