Background: Biosimilar drugs have broadened the treatment options in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Real-world data comparing clinical outcomes of originator follitropin alfa (Gonal-f) with its biosimilars are required to enrich the body of evidence for clinical decision-making on choice of drug.
Aims: To compare the ART outcomes in patients receiving originator follitropin (Gonal-f) and its biosimilars in clinical setting.
Settings And Design: Medical records of 364 infertile women who underwent ART between 2016 and 2020 at Akanksha Hospital and Research Institute, Gujrat, India, were retrospectively analysed.
Materials And Methods: Participants were divided into two cohorts based on treatment (Gonal-f cohort; = 174 and biosimilar cohort; = 190), each cohort further subdivided into group A (age <35 years) and group B (age ≥35 years). Fresh or frozen embryo transfer was performed as per the standard procedures of the clinic. Pregnancy rates and live birth rate (LBR) were the primary main outcome measures in this study.
Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics and Chi-square test were used for analysis.
Results: The number of oocytes retrieved from Gonal-f and biosimilar cohorts were comparable (13.3 vs. 14.4). Compared to biosimilars, Gonal-f treatment resulted in higher yield of cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryos, and the proportion of women with good quality embryos was higher in the Gonal-f cohort than the biosimilar cohort (83.3% vs. 69.5%). Patients receiving Gonal-f reported higher pregnancy rates (59.2% vs. 39.7%) and LBR (43% vs. 17.7%) compared to those receiving biosimilars.
Conclusions: Gonal-f (originator follitropin) treatment could result in higher pregnancy rates and LBR in comparison to biosimilars in real-world setting.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404022 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_37_23 | DOI Listing |
Hum Reprod
December 2024
Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Study Question: Is the probability of pregnancy different between women using biosimilars versus the originator of follitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in ART?
Summary Answer: Meta-analysis of eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) suggests that live birth, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy rates are significantly lower with biosimilars of follitropin alfa compared to the originator.
What Is Known Already: All biosimilars of follitropin alfa have received regulatory approval by demonstrating non-inferiority in the number of retrieved oocytes compared to the originator. Nevertheless, the most clinically relevant outcome in ART for both clinicians and patients is live birth.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
December 2024
The International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Environ Health (Wash)
November 2024
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032, China.
Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), an environmental endocrine disruptor, has hormone-like activity and endocrine-disrupting effects. However, the types of reproductive hormones associated with DEHP vary across the studies. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to pool existing epidemiological evidence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGynecol Obstet Invest
November 2024
Jean Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France.
Objective: Various gonadotropins are used for ovarian stimulation (OS). This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of different gonadotropins based on real-world data from the French National Health Database (SNDS) over a 7-year follow-up of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments.
Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis of different gonadotropins based on real-world data from the SNDS was conducted.
Reprod Health
November 2024
Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria.
Background: Menstrual irregularities significantly distress women living with HIV (WLHIV), impacting their reproductive health and quality of life. Although the underlying mechanism remains inconclusive, studies have outlined possible contributory factors. This narrative review explores the burden of menstrual irregularities and associated hormonal dysregulation among women living with HIV in Nigeria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!