Influence of quality of reduction using radiological criteria on kinematics and kinetics in ankle fractures with unstable syndesmotic injury.

Background: In ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury, the anatomic reduction of the ankle mortise is crucial for preventing osteoarthritis. Yet, no studies have analysed the effect of surgical reduction after unstable ankle fractures on patients' active functional outcome.

Methods: The Intraoperative 3D imaging data of patients surgically treated between 2012 and 2019 for ankle fracture with concomitant syndesmotic injury were reviewed. 58 patients were allocated to two groups depending on whether the criteria for radiologically optimal reduction were met (39 patients) or not (19 patients). Criteria for optimal reduction were composed of objectively measured and subjectively rated data. After undertaking the Olerud/Molander ankle score, a gait analysis and several active function tests using 3D motion capture were performed in order to evaluate kinetic and kinematic differences between both groups.

Findings: Patients showed deficits of range of motion and balance parameters on the injured ankle, however, there were no significant differences between both groups.

Interpretation: Although, the data did not show that radiological reduction criteria have a statistically significant effect on active functional outcome after a mean follow up time of 5.7 years, tendencies for a better outcome of patients that met the criteria could be seen. It also must be taken into consideration that results are limited by case number and allocation ratio, which made a sub-analysis of the separate reduction criteria unfeasible.