Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Acute ischemic stroke remains the primary cause of disability worldwide. For patients with large vessel occlusions, intravenous thrombolysis followed by mechanical thrombectomy remains the standard of care. Revascularization of the large vessel is typically successful. However, despite reopening of the occluded vessel, many patients fail to return to independence. Functional failure, despite macrovascular recanalization, is often referred to as the no-reflow phenomenon. Even with an extensive characterization of reperfusion in animal models, numerous mechanisms may explain no-reflow. Further, uniform measurements of this microvascular dysfunction and prognostic markers associated with no-reflow are lacking. In this review, we highlight a number of mechanisms that may explain no-reflow, characterize current multimodal measurements, and assess its molecular markers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.044240 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!