AI Article Synopsis

  • Increased interest in using ultrasound (US) for diagnosing cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) reveals that the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve correlates with disease severity and findings from electrodiagnostic studies (EDX).
  • A study of 117 patients showed that US identified more cases of CuTS (81.20%) compared to EDX (71.79%), with surgically treated patients displaying greater preoperative CSA values. The CSA also increased with the severity of the EDX results.
  • The findings suggest that US is a reliable diagnostic tool that can aid in decision-making for CuTS treatment, as patients with positive US and EDX had worse physical function,

Article Abstract

Background: There is increased interest in ultrasound (US) for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). We hypothesize that ulnar nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) correlates with disease severity and electrodiagnostic studies (EDX).

Methods: ARetrospective review was performed at a tertiary medical center. One hundred seventeen patients (166 ulnar nerves) were evaluated. Maximum CSA at 3 points around the elbow (proximal, groove, and distal) and EDX results (American Board of Electrodiagnostic Medicine-certified physiatrist's interpretations) were collected.

Results: US was positive (CSA > 0.1 cm) in 95/117 cases (81.20%) versus 84/117 (71.79%) positive for EDX. CuTS patients treated surgically had significantly greater (0.13 cm, standard deviation [SD] 0.038) preoperative CSA than non-operative patients (0.10 cm, SD 0.033) ( = .003). CSA increased as EDX increased in severity; mild (0.116 cm, SD 0.031), moderate (0.121 cm, SD 0.035), and severe (0.163 cm, SD 0.047) with a significant difference between the mild and severe groups ( = .001) and between the moderate and severe groups ( = .01). Significant differences were seen between patients with positive US and EDX studies compared to those with negative US and EDX in the average physical function scores (57.26, SD 8.57 versus 43.18, SD 7.70; < .001); average sleep scores (50.14, SD 9.53 versus 56.62, SD 7.31; = .02); average physical function scores (43.04, SD 8.68 versus 57.08, SD 6.34; < .001) and average depression scores (49.10, SD 10.88 versus 45.043, SD 7.06; = .02).

Conclusions: US is a reliable tool for diagnosis and surgical decision-making for CuTS.

Type Of Study/level Of Evidence: Diagnostic/III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653299PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15589447231187081DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ulnar nerve
8
diagnosis cubital
8
cubital tunnel
8
tunnel syndrome
8
positive edx
8
severe groups
8
average physical
8
physical function
8
function scores
8
001 average
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!