Coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CGMD) simulations address lengthscales and timescales that are critical to many chemical and material applications. Nevertheless, contemporary CGMD modeling is relatively bespoke and there are no black-box CGMD methodologies available that could play a comparable role in discovery applications that density functional theory plays for electronic structure. This gap might be filled by machine learning (ML)-based CGMD potentials that simplify model development, but these methods are still in their early stages and have yet to demonstrate a significant advantage over existing physics-based CGMD methods. Here, we explore the potential of Δ-learning models to leverage the advantages of these two approaches. This is implemented by using ML-based potentials to learn the difference between the target CGMD variable and the predictions of physics-based potentials. The Δ-models are benchmarked against the baseline models in reproducing on-target and off-target atomistic properties as a function of CG resolution, mapping operator, and system topology. The Δ-models outperform the reference ML-only CGMD models in nearly all scenarios. In several cases, the ML-only models manage to minimize training errors while still producing qualitatively incorrect dynamics, which is corrected by the Δ-models. Given their negligible added cost, Δ-models provide essentially free gains over their ML-only counterparts. Nevertheless, an unexpected finding is that neither the Δ-learning models nor the ML-only models significantly outperform the elementary pairwise models in reproducing atomistic properties. This fundamental failure is attributed to the relatively large irreducible force errors associated with coarse-graining that produces little benefit from using more complex potentials.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0157742 | DOI Listing |
J Neurosci
February 2013
Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA.
Signaled active avoidance (AA) paradigms train subjects to prevent an aversive outcome by performing a learned behavior during the presentation of a conditioned cue. This complex form of conditioning involves pavlovian and instrumental components, which produce competing behavioral responses that must be reconciled for the subject to successfully avoid an aversive stimulus. In signaled AA paradigm for rat, we tested the hypothesis that the instrumental component of AA training recruits infralimbic prefrontal cortex (ilPFC) to inhibit central amygdala (CeA)-mediated Pavlovian reactions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Neurosci
June 1997
Immunology Research Center Branislav Janković, Belgrade, FR Yugoslavia.
The present study was performed to investigate and compare the effect of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, physostigmine (0.045, 0.060 and 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!