A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of chlorin-e6 detection efficiency by video systems with excitation wavelengths of 405nm and 635nm. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared two wide field-of-view fluorescence imaging systems with different excitation wavelengths (405 nm and 635 nm) for diagnosing tumors.
  • Both systems were tested on tumor phantoms as well as in six patients with basal cell carcinoma and oral mucosa cancer, confirming the ability to define lesion boundaries and fluorescence intensity.
  • The 405 nm system outperformed the 635 nm system in distinguishing between tumor and healthy tissue for oral mucosal cancer, indicating greater effectiveness in eliminating background noise and providing consistent fluorescence quantification.

Article Abstract

Background: Fluorescence diagnostics with two different wide field-of-view imaging systems with fluorescence excitation at 405 nm and 635 nm, respectively, were compared. Both systems include fluorescence quantification and experimental geometry normalization algorithms.

Methods: A newly developed system with an excitation wavelength of 405 nm was tested on intralipid fluorescent tumor phantoms with chlorin-e6. Both, this new system and a second existing system with an excitation wavelength of 635 nm, were used for fluorescent diagnosis in six patients with basal cell carcinoma and cancer of the oral mucosa. For PDT, a red diode laser with a wavelength of 660 nm was used for all 6 patients. One patient received an additional irradiation using the red LED source of the new system RESULTS: The boundaries of the lesions and the fluorescence intensity were successfully determined by both video systems.

Conclusions: Both fluorescence imaging approaches showed comparable contrast between diseased and healthy tissues. For oral mucosal cancer, a system with violet fluorescence excitation, bispectral frame analysis, and time-resolved background suppression showed better contrast between the tumor and normal tissue and effective elimination of autofluorescence. Moreover, both systems provided efficient quantification of fluorescence and gave fluorescence indices that were weakly dependent on the distance between the device and the tissue.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103729DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluorescence
8
fluorescence excitation
8
system excitation
8
excitation wavelength
8
excitation
5
system
5
comparison chlorin-e6
4
chlorin-e6 detection
4
detection efficiency
4
efficiency video
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!