Objectives: We aimed to assess the performance of the Novodiag Stool Parasites (NSP) assay in the diagnosis of the most common intestinal protozoan and microsporidia infections.

Methods: A panel of 167 selected stool samples was retrospectively analysed with the NSP assay and compared to routine microscopy and qPCR methods for the detection of pathogenic protozoa and microsporidia.

Results: Whereas specificity was high for all protozoa and microsporidia, NSP sensitivity was strongly dependent on the comparative method used as reference. When compared to microscopic methods, NSP sensitivity was high (96.7 to 100%) for , and but was lower for (85.2%) and ≤50% for and . In comparison to conventional qPCR, the NSP assay demonstrated lower sensitivity characteristics dependent on parasite loads, reaching 60 to 70% for , , spp. and Sensitivity was 100% for , but none of the five samples containing spp. were detected.

Conclusions: The overall performance of the NSP assay in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal protozoa and microsporidia seems to be better than or equivalent to that observed with microscopic methods but inferior to that obtainable with classical targeted qPCR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10385646PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12070889DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nsp assay
16
protozoa microsporidia
12
performance novodiag
8
novodiag stool
8
stool parasites
8
assay diagnosis
8
nsp sensitivity
8
microscopic methods
8
nsp
6
assay
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!