Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: More than 2 decades of neuroimaging research has sought to uncover the neurologic basis of sexual desire. However, the lack of a clear conceptual distinction between sexual desire and sexual arousal or even a broadly accepted definition of sexual desire has led to confusion in the literature regarding brain areas uniquely associated with sexual desire.
Objectives: (1) To critically review the neuroimaging literature that seeks to identify brain areas and networks involved in sexual desire; (2) to identify and discuss those brain areas and potential networks that are most promising for providing insights to sexual desire; and (3) to offer recommendations for future studies.
Methods: Existing meta-analyses were used as a starting point to identify relevant neuroimaging studies on sexual desire, arousal, and love. This base was then expanded via Google Scholar and forward citation tracking of already identified studies.
Results: Brain areas that are commonly associated with sexual desire and arousal include the amygdala, hypothalamus, dorsal and ventral striatum, anterior cingulate, insula, and prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortex. However, because the same basic paradigm has been used to study sexual desire and arousal, unambiguous conclusions regarding areas uniquely involved in sexual desire cannot be drawn. Moreover, the lack of connectivity analyses and a failure to acknowledge negative BOLD (blood-oxygen level dependent) significantly limit conclusions on the neural basis of sexual desire.
Conclusion: Five recommendations are made. First, stimulus types (ie, erotic vs sexually explicit) should be selected by the meaningful theoretical conceptualization of the constructs of interest. Second, participants should be provided with definitions of sexual desire, mental sexual arousal, and perceived genital sexual arousal, so they can choose which terms best describe their experience. Third, event-related designs should be used with caution when investigating sexual desire. Fourth, time series analyses should be used to identify both positive and negative BOLD. Fifth, connectivity analyses should be performed to identify brain networks.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qead029 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!