Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3344 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Evaluating ChatGPT's Multilingual Performance in Clinical Nutrition Advice Using Synthetic Medical Text: Insights from Central Asia.
J Nutr
December 2024
Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan. Electronic address:
Background: While large language models like ChatGPT-4 have demonstrated competency in English, their performance for minority groups speaking underrepresented languages, as well as their ability to adapt to specific socio-cultural nuances and regional cuisines, such as those in Central Asia (e.g., Kazakhstan), still requires further investigation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChatbots for breast cancer education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Support Care Cancer
December 2024
Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Background: Effective education and awareness regarding breast cancer are critical. Traditional educational methods often fail to meet the diverse information needs of patients. Patients should be provided with tailored, accessible information to improve their retention and understanding of disease-related information.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiagnosis, treatment, and prevention of ankle sprains: Comparing free chatbot recommendations with clinical guidelines.
Foot Ankle Surg
December 2024
Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, Göttingen 37075, Germany. Electronic address:
Background: Free chatbots powered by large language models offer lateral ankle sprains (LAS) treatment recommendations but lack scientific validation.
Methods: The chatbots-Claude, Perplexity, and ChatGPT-were evaluated by comparing their responses to a questionnaire and their treatment algorithms against current clinical guidelines. Responses were graded on accuracy, conclusiveness, supplementary information, and incompleteness, and evaluated individually and collectively, with a 60 % pass threshold.
ChatGPT (GPT-4) versus doctors on complex cases of the Swedish family medicine specialist examination: an observational comparative study.
BMJ Open
December 2024
General Practice / Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Institute of Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Background: Recent breakthroughs in artificial intelligence research include the development of generative pretrained transformers (GPT). ChatGPT has been shown to perform well when answering several sets of medical multiple-choice questions. However, it has not been tested for writing free-text assessments of complex cases in primary care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPhysician vs. AI-generated messages in urology: evaluation of accuracy, completeness, and preference by patients and physicians.
World J Urol
December 2024
Department of Urology, Baldwin Park Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente, 1011 Baldwin Park Blvd., Baldwin Park, CA, 91706, USA.
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy, comprehensiveness, empathetic tone, and patient preference for AI and urologist responses to patient messages concerning common BPH questions across phases of care.
Methods: Cross-sectional study evaluating responses to 20 BPH-related questions generated by 2 AI chatbots and 4 urologists in a simulated clinical messaging environment without direct patient interaction. Accuracy, completeness, and empathetic tone of responses assessed by experts using Likert scales, and preferences and perceptions of authorship (chatbot vs.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!