Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: Anatomically correct patient-specific models made from medical imaging can be printed on a three-dimensional (3D) printer or turned into a virtual reality (VR) program. Until recently, use in anesthesia has been limited. In 2019, the anesthesia department at Tel Aviv Medical Center launched a 3D program with the aim of using 3D modelling to assist in preoperative anesthesia planning.
Methods: A retrospective review of all relevant patients between July 2019 and June 2021 referred for preoperative airway planning with 3D modelling. Patient files were reviewed for correlation between the model-based airway plan and the actual airway plan, the type of model used, and any anesthetic complications related to airway management.
Results: Twenty patients were referred for 3D modelling. Of these, 15 models were printed, including 12 children requiring one lung ventilation. Five patients had VR reconstructions, including three with mediastinal masses. One patient had both a 3D-printed model and a VR reconstruction. There were two cases (10%) where the model plan did not correlate with the final airway plan and one case where a model could not be created because of poor underlying imaging. For the remaining 17 cases, the plan devised on the model matched the final airway plan. There were no anesthetic complications.
Conclusions: Three-dimensional modelling and subsequent printing or VR reconstruction are feasible in clinical anesthesia. Its routine use for patients with challenging airway anatomy correlated well with the final clinical outcome in most cases. High-quality imaging is essential.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02530-2 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!