A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Modified Unilateral Approach for Ventrally Located Spinal Tumors. | LitMetric

Surgery on spinal tumors becomes challenging when the tumor is ventral to the spinal cord. Conventionally, we approach it posteriorly through bilateral laminectomy and rotate the cord after sectioning the dentate ligament and nerve roots. However, manipulating the cord can be hazardous, and a long bilateral laminectomy can be invasive. Meanwhile, a narrow operative field and a limited lateral viewing angle in a unilateral approach constrained the surgeon. To overcome these problems, we previously reported a technique of modified unilateral approach where we incised the skin and the fascia horizontally and placed a pair of retractors longitudinally.The current article reports our experience applying this approach in 15 patients with ventrally located spinal tumors. The approach was performed on 10 schwannomas, 2 meningiomas, and 3 others. We evaluated paraspinal muscle atrophy on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.The modified unilateral approach provided an excellent surgical field for removing ventrally located tumors. Gross total removal was achieved in 11 patients (92% of benign tumors). No neurological complications occurred except for one case of transient weakness. We encountered no wound-related late complications such as pain or deformity. The reduction of the cross-sectional area of the paraspinal muscles on the approach side (compared to the nonapproach side) was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.72-1.06), indicating 7% atrophy (statistically nonsignificant, p = 0.48).We believe this simple technique can be useful for removing spinal tumors located ventral to the spinal cord.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687673PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0330DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unilateral approach
16
spinal tumors
16
modified unilateral
12
ventrally located
12
approach
8
located spinal
8
ventral spinal
8
spinal cord
8
bilateral laminectomy
8
spinal
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!