AI Article Synopsis
- The study evaluated the adherence to five key transparency practices (data availability, code availability, protocol registration, conflicts of interest, and funding disclosures) in open access COVID-19 research articles from January 2020 to June 2022.
- A total of 258,678 articles were analyzed, with 72% yielding full texts; most were research articles, and a significant number disclosed conflicts of interest and funding but showed lower rates for data and code sharing, particularly in review articles.
- The findings indicated that adherence to transparency practices was highest in articles published in 2022 and varied by journal impact, with less transparent articles being associated with lower citation rates.
Article Abstract
Background: We aimed to assess the adherence to five transparency practices (data availability, code availability, protocol registration and conflicts of interest (COI), and funding disclosures) from open access Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related articles.
Methods: We searched and exported all open access COVID-19-related articles from PubMed-indexed journals in the Europe PubMed Central database published from January 2020 to June 9, 2022. With a validated and automated tool, we detected transparent practices of three paper types: research articles, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and reviews. Basic journal- and article-related information were retrieved from the database. We used R for the descriptive analyses.
Results: The total number of articles was 258,678, of which we were able to retrieve full texts of 186,157 (72%) articles from the database Over half of the papers (55.7%, n = 103,732) were research articles, 10.9% (n = 20,229) were review articles, and less than one percent (n = 1,202) were RCTs. Approximately nine-tenths of articles (in all three paper types) had a statement to disclose COI. Funding disclosure (83.9%, confidence interval (CI): 81.7-85.8 95%) and protocol registration (53.5%, 95% CI: 50.7-56.3) were more frequent in RCTs than in reviews or research articles. Reviews shared data (2.5%, 95% CI: 2.3-2.8) and code (0.4%, 95% CI: 0.4-0.5) less frequently than RCTs or research articles. Articles published in 2022 had the highest adherence to all five transparency practices. Most of the reviews (62%) and research articles (58%) adhered to two transparency practices, whereas almost half of the RCTs (47%) adhered to three practices. There were journal- and publisher-related differences in all five practices, and articles that did not adhere to transparency practices were more likely published in lowest impact journals and were less likely cited.
Conclusion: While most articles were freely available and had a COI disclosure, adherence to other transparent practices was far from acceptable. A much stronger commitment to open science practices, particularly to protocol registration, data and code sharing, is needed from all stakeholders.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370694 | PMC |
| http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0288406 | PLOS |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
The Challenges Ahead: Concepts, Analytics, and Ethics of Value-Based Care in Applied Behavior Analysis.
Behav Anal Pract
December 2024
RethinkFirst, New York, NY USA.
Value-based care has incrementally increased its footprint across healthcare over the past 2 decades. Several organizations in ABA have begun experimenting with various components of value-based care specific to the delivery of ABA services and it seems likely that this trend will continue into the future. For those new to value-based care, this article reviews the main conceptual components as well as common myths and misconceptions about value-based care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEvaluating the Biomechanical Effects and Real-World Usability of a Novel Ankle Exo for Runners.
J Biomech Eng
January 2025
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 2201 West End Avenue, Nashville, TN, 37235.
Achilles tendon overuse injuries are common for long-distance runners. Ankle exos (exoskeletons and exosuits) are wearable devices that can reduce Achilles tendon loading and could potentially aid in the rehabilitation or prevention of these injuries by helping to mitigate and control tissue loading. However, most ankle exos are confined to controlled lab testing and are not practical to use in real-world running.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Influence of Project ECHO and Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care on Emergency Department Visits Among Youth Diagnosed with Depression.
J Behav Health Serv Res
January 2025
Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC15018, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Rates of depression among youth and emergency department (ED) visits for un- or under-treated symptoms are on the rise. Early identification and treatment of depression is imperative at the patient, program, system, and population levels. This paper examines the individual and cumulative impact of Project ECHO and the inclusion of IBH services in pediatric primary care practices on mental health-related ED rates among youth diagnosed with depression for those practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTunneling nanotubes between bone marrow stromal cells support transmitophagy and resistance to apoptosis in myeloma.
Blood Cancer J
January 2025
Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Environment, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Patient safety indicators for virtual consultations in primary care: A systematic review protocol.
PLoS One
January 2025
NWL Patient Safety Research Collaboration, Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Background: Virtual consultations are being increasingly incorporated into routine primary care, as they offer better time and geographical flexibility for patients while also being cost-effective for both patients and service providers. At the same time, concerns have been raised about the extent to which virtual care is safe for patients. As of now, there is no validated methodology for evaluating the safety nuances and implications of virtual care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!