A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

How to distinguish Guillain-Barré syndrome from nitrous oxide-induced neuropathy: A 2-year, multicentric, retrospective study. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • A lot of people have been using nitrous oxide (N O), which can cause muscle problems and make it hard to move.
  • Researchers looked at 58 patients with nitrous oxide issues and compared them to 47 patients with a similar condition called Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).
  • They found that checking vitamin B12 levels and looking for certain nerve signs can help doctors tell the difference between the two conditions quickly.

Article Abstract

Background: Recreational use of nitrous oxide (N O) has dramatically increased in recent years, resulting in numerous cases of acute sensorimotor tetraparesis secondary to nitrous oxide-induced neuropathy (N On). Challenging clinical features can mimic Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), the main differential diagnosis upon admission. The most sensitive biomarkers for distinguishing between these two conditions remain to be determined.

Methods: Fifty-eight N On patients from three referral centers were retrospectively included over a 2-year period and compared to GBS patients hospitalized during the same timeframe (47 patients). Collected demographic, clinical, biological, and electrophysiological data were compared between the two groups.

Results: The typical N On clinical pattern included distal sensorimotor deficit in lower limbs with absent reflexes, proprioceptive ataxia, and no cranial involvement (56.7% of our cohort). Misleading GBS-like presentations were found in 14 N On patients (24.1%), and 13 patients (22.4%) did not report N O use during initial interview. Only half the N On patients presented with reduced vitamin B12 serum levels upon admission. A slightly increased cut-off (<200 pmol/L) demonstrated 85.1% sensitivity and 84.5% specificity in distinguishing N On from GBS. Only 6.9% of N On patients met the criteria for primary demyelination (p < 0.01), with only one presenting conduction blocks. A diagnostic algorithm combining these two biomarkers successfully classified all GBS-like N On patients.

Conclusions: Vitamin B12 serum level < 200 pmol/L cut-off and conduction blocks in initial electrophysiological study are the two most sensitive biomarkers for rapidly distinguishing N On from GBS patients. These two parameters are particularly useful in clinically atypical N On with GBS-like presentation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.15998DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

guillain-barré syndrome
8
nitrous oxide-induced
8
oxide-induced neuropathy
8
patients
6
distinguish guillain-barré
4
syndrome nitrous
4
neuropathy 2-year
4
2-year multicentric
4
multicentric retrospective
4
retrospective study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!