Objective: This study aims to explore differences in access to care as experienced by patients registered in team-based primary healthcare clinics according to their social vulnerability profile.
Method: A total of 1,562 patients from four team-based primary healthcare clinics completed an e-survey conducted between June and November 2021. The social vulnerability index was used to compare the experiences.
Results: Patients with low vulnerability consulted at emergency rooms three times more often because their family physician was not available ( = 0.006) than patients with no vulnerability. Lack of continuity was reported two times more often by patients with low vulnerability related to team members not knowing their recent medical history ( = 0.006) and by patients with high vulnerability related to no one being in charge of their file ( = 0.023). Both vulnerable groups reported receiving contradictory information more often than patients with no vulnerability.
Conclusion: Patients with high vulnerability experienced more access difficulties related to continuity, interprofessional collaboration and communication with providers.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10370394 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2023.27091 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!