AI Article Synopsis

  • A nationwide study evaluated the safety of using ibrutinib alongside anticoagulants, focusing on the risk of clinically relevant bleeding (CRB).
  • The study identified 614 cases of CRB from patients hospitalized for bleeding, and matched them with 2407 controls based on age, sex, and follow-up duration.
  • Results indicated a significant risk increase for CRB in patients on both ibrutinib and anticoagulants, with the odds being particularly high for parenteral anticoagulants (3.40 times higher risk).

Article Abstract

Data regarding the safety of co-administration of ibrutinib with anticoagulants in real-life settings are scarce. Using a nationwide database, we conducted a nested case-control study in a cohort of new users of ibrutinib to assess the risk of clinically relevant bleeding (CRB) associated with anticoagulation. Cases were patients with a diagnosis of CRB, defined as hospitalization with a diagnosis of bleeding. The date of CRB constituted the index date. Up to four controls were matched on sex, age at index date and duration of follow-up. The risk of CRB associated with anticoagulation in patients receiving ibrutinib was estimated using conditional logistic regression models, providing odds ratios (OR) adjusted for risk factors of bleeding. Among 614 cases and 2407 matched controls, the risk of CRB was significantly higher in patients receiving both ibrutinib and anticoagulants (adjusted OR [aOR] 2.54, confidence interval [CI] 95% [1.94; 3.32]). When considering anticoagulant class, aOR was 1.99 (CI 95% [1.19; 3.33]) for VKA, 2.48 (CI 95% [1.76; 3.47]) for direct oral anticoagulants and 3.40 (CI 95% [2.01; 5.75]) for parenteral anticoagulants. In conclusion, this study found a 2.5-fold increased risk of CRB in patients receiving both ibrutinib and anticoagulants in real-life settings, and similar aOR among oral anticoagulants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjh.18995DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ibrutinib anticoagulants
12
risk crb
12
patients receiving
12
receiving ibrutinib
12
nested case-control
8
case-control study
8
anticoagulants real-life
8
real-life settings
8
bleeding crb
8
crb associated
8

Similar Publications

Perioperative management of antithrombotic agents requires practical and medical considerations. Discontinuing antithrombotic therapies increases the risk of thrombotic adverse events including cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and retinal artery occlusion. Conversely, continuation of antithrombotic therapy during surgical procedures has associated bleeding risks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The risk vs. benefit calculus of anticoagulation in patients with ibrutinib-related atrial fibrillation.

Leuk Lymphoma

February 2024

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

For ibrutinib-related atrial fibrillation (IRAF), guidelines for anticoagulation do not exist. We sought to describe stroke, bleeding, and anticoagulation rates among patients with IRAF. We performed a single-center retrospective review of 168 patients treated with ibrutinib followed from 2013 to 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To evaluate the availability of published comparative real-world evidence (RWE) studies in Medicare patients for the ten drugs set to undergo Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) price negotiations in 2026. A scoping review was completed in MEDLINE/PubMed to evaluate the availability of comparative RWE investigations conducted among Medicare-eligible patient populations in the US for the following drugs: apixaban, rivaroxaban, sitagliptin, ibrutinib, empagliflozin, etanercept, dapagliflozin, sacubitril/valsartan, ustekinumab and insulin aspart. Of the 170 real-world comparative studies identified, 55 (32.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A nationwide study evaluated the safety of using ibrutinib alongside anticoagulants, focusing on the risk of clinically relevant bleeding (CRB).
  • The study identified 614 cases of CRB from patients hospitalized for bleeding, and matched them with 2407 controls based on age, sex, and follow-up duration.
  • Results indicated a significant risk increase for CRB in patients on both ibrutinib and anticoagulants, with the odds being particularly high for parenteral anticoagulants (3.40 times higher risk).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Increased rates of clinically significant bleeding have been reported with ibrutinib, however, limited data is available on the risk when given with concomitant therapeutic anticoagulation. We analyzed the incidence of major bleeding in 64 patient exposures that received ibrutinib with concomitant therapeutic anticoagulation. Major bleeding was observed in 5/64 (8%) patient exposures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!