In vitro μ-opioid receptor activation potential of U10 and β-U10, positional isomers of the synthetic opioid naphthyl U-47700.

Drug Test Anal

Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Published: March 2024

New synthetic opioids (NSOs) with diverse chemical structures continue to appear on recreational drug markets worldwide. U-type opioids have become one of the largest groups of non-fentanyl-related NSOs. Starting in 2020, a previously unreported U-compound coined "β-U10" (2-naphthyl U-47700; N-[2-(dimethylamino)cyclohexyl]-N-methylnaphthalene-2-carboxamide) was identified in Australia and the United States. β-U10 is a positional isomer of α-U10 (1-naphthyl U-47700), more commonly known as "U10." Here, the first comparative in vitro pharmacological characterization of naphthyl U-47700 (U10 and β-U10), together with the structural analogue U-47700 and fentanyl, is reported. Application of a cell-based μ-opioid receptor (MOR) activation (β-arrestin 2 recruitment) assay demonstrated β-U10 (EC  = 348 nM; E  = 150% vs. hydromorphone) to be less potent than U-47700 (EC  = 116 nM; E  = 154%) and fentanyl (EC  = 9.35 nM; E  = 146%) but considerably more active than the α-isomer (EC value in the μM range). For the latter, maximum receptor activation could not be reached at 100 μM. The difference in MOR activation potential for U10 and β-U10 stresses the importance of (analytical) differentiation between closely related analytes. The emergence of β-U10 on the recreational drug market is an example of the continuing emergence of non-fentanyl-related NSOs and further emphasizes the need to closely monitor fluctuations in the drug supply.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dta.3554DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

u10 β-u10
12
μ-opioid receptor
8
receptor activation
8
activation potential
8
potential u10
8
β-u10 positional
8
naphthyl u-47700
8
recreational drug
8
non-fentanyl-related nsos
8
mor activation
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: overexpression/amplification in wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-positive mCRC) appears to be associated with limited benefit from anti-EGFR antibodies and promising responses to dual-HER2 inhibition; however, comparative efficacy has not been investigated. We conducted a randomized phase II trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of dual-HER2 inhibition against standard-of-care anti-EGFR antibody-based therapy as second/third-line treatment in HER2-positive mCRC.

Methods: Patients with -WT mCRC after central confirmation of HER2 positivity (immunohistochemistry 3+ or 2+ and in situ hybridization amplified [HER2/CEP17 ratio >2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: A phase II/III trial is a type of phase III trial that has embedded in it an intermediate phase II go/no-go decision as to whether to continue the accrual to the phase III sample size. We examine the design characteristics and experience of a well-defined set of National Cancer Institute phase II/III trials, with special emphasis on designed accrual suspensions while awaiting the data to become mature enough for the phase II analysis. This experience is used to highlight the potential of using a calendar backstop to avoid an inordinately long accrual suspension.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: This review aimed to describe research initiatives, evolution, and processes of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-supported Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN). This may be of interest and inform researchers wishing to conduct multisite coordinated research initiatives as well as to provide perspective to all urogynecologists regarding how the PFDN has evolved and functions.

Study Design: Principal investigators of several PFDN clinical sites and Data Coordinating Center describe more than 20 years of development and maturation of the PFDN.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study emphasizes the importance of identifying when visual acuity (VA) in amblyopia patients has stabilized to inform treatment choices.
  • The researchers simulated various VA measurements to assess the accuracy (false-positive and false-negative rates) of different rules for determining VA stability across multiple visits and treatments.
  • Results showed significant variability in false-positive and false-negative rates depending on the measurement rules used, suggesting that clinicians should choose rules based on whether they want to minimize overlooking stabilization or misclassifying improvement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!